ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

Reconstruction of verbal conjugation in Samoyedic languages: Personal inflexions of the indicative and markers of conjugation types

DOI:10.30842/alp23065737191256300
PDF, 626.4 kb
Urmanchiyeva A. Yu. Rekonstruktsiya glagolnogo spryazheniya v samodiyskikh yazykakh: lichno-chislovyye pokazateli indikativa i formanty tipov spryazheniya. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2023. 19(1): 256–300.

The article addresses reconstruction of the verbal conjugation in Samoyedic languages. As is well known, their conjugation system is the richest in Nenets, Enets and Nganasan, where the verbal paradigm shows four series of personal affixes (the subjective conjugation, the objective conjugation used for objects in the singular, the objective conjugation used for objects in the dual/plural, and the reflexive conjugation). Additional morphophonological transformations of the grammatical stem also point to the need for reconstructing the formants for two conjugation types — the objective conjugation with dual/plural objects and the reflexive conjugation. Although the idea of the need for verbal conjugation reconstruction in the Samoyedic languages is not new, the article specifies the phonetic reconstruction of personal suffixes as 1Du *-mə-in2, 2Du *-rə-in2 in the objective conjugation for singular objects (instead of *-min2, *-rin2, as proposed earlier). The main argument for reconstruction of the vowel sequence is a twofold reflexation: in Nganasan we find the phonetic development path like *-mə-in2 > -mə-jn2 > -MIC (the plain final * would result in j in Nganasan, but we also cannot reconstruct the final *n on the base of Selkup correspondences like -mī; thus the only option left is reconstruction of the final -jn2 for Proto-Nganasan), whereas in Tundra Nenets the path is like *-mə-in > -mə-in > -məih > -mih (the plain Proto-Samoyedic or Proto-Northern Samoyedic *i would result in ə in Proto-Nenets — thus the correct reconstruction implies a vowel sequence). This means, that the personal suffixes have preserved their complex character both in Proto-Samoyedic and in Proto-Northern Samoyedic. The paper for the first time proposes a reconstruction of the reflexive conjugation formant *-ń on the base of the nasal element of personal suffixes in Nganasan (like 2Pl -N-TUɁ or 3Pl -N-TƏɁ in the reflexive conjugation) and on the base of morphophonological modifications of the grammatical stem in the reflexive conjugation (though these modifications by and large resemble the modifications before the *j, they are not identical with them in Tundra Nenets). From the point of view of historical phonetics, the development of this *-ń of the reflexive conjugation matches the phonetic development of the derivational suffix *-ń of verbs with medial semantics, still preserved in its original form in Nganasan, cf. Nganasan hi-n- ‘to be cooked’.

Keywords
Samoyedic languages, verbal conjugation, linguistic reconstruction
References
Alatalo Ms.
J. Alatalo. The morphophonemes of the Selkup language (under preparation).
Bybee et al. 1994
J. Bybee, R. Perkins, W. Pagliuca. Evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Castrén 1854
M. A. Castrén. Grammatik der Samojedischen Sprachen. St. Petersburg: Bedruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1854.
Donner, Joki 1944
A. J. Joki. Kai Donners Kamassisches Wörterbuch nebst Sprachproben und Hauptzügen der Grammatik. Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Aulis J. Joki. (Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae VIII). Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura, 1944.
Gusev 2018
V. Yu. Gusev. O koaffiksakh lokativnykh padezhey i o lokativnykh prilagatelnykh v samodiyskikh yazykakh [Co-affixes of local cases and locative adjectives in Samoyed. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Samoyed Studies. Tartu University, Tartu, 26–27 October 2018]. Prezentation available at: https://sisu.ut.ee/sites/default/files/samoyedology2018/files/gusev_tartu-2018_presentation.pdf (accessed on 20.08.2022).
Helimski 1997
E. Helimski. Die Matorische Sprache. Wörterverzeichnis — Grundzüge der Grammatik — Sprachgeschichte. Unter Mitarbeit von Beáta Nagy. (Studia uralo-altaica 41). Szeged: Szeged University, 1997.
Helimsky 1982
E. A. Helimsky. Drevneyshiye vengersko-samodiyskiye yazykovyye paralleli (Lingvisticheskaya i yetnogeneticheskaya interpretatsiya) [Earliest Hungarian–Samoyedic linguistic parallels (Linguistic and ethnogenetic interpretation)]. Moscow: Nauka, 1982.
Helimsky 1983 // 2000
E. A. Helimsky. Prasamodiyskiye serii posessivov i ikh refleksy (Protosamoyedic sets of possessive markers anf their reflexes). Vyach. Vs. Ivanov, T. N. Moloshnaya, T. M. Nikolayeva (eds.). Kategoriya prityazhatelnosti v slavyanskikh i balkanskikh yazykakh. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. P. 107–112 (republished in: E. A. Helimskiy. Komparativistika, uralistika. Lektsii i stati [Comparative and Uralic studies. Lectures and papers]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury, 2000. P. 45–49).
Helimsky 1994
E. A. Helimsky. Ocherk morfonologii i slovoizmenitelnoy morfologii nganasanskogo yazyka [Essay on morphophonology and infl ectional morphology of the Nganasan language]. E. A. Helimsky (ed.). Taymyrskiy etnolingvisticheskiy sbornik [Taimyr ethnolinguistic volume]. Iss. 1: Materialy po nganasanskomu yazyku i shamanstvu [Materials on Nganasan language and shamanism]. Moscow: Russian State University for Humanities Press, 1994. P. 190–221.
Janhunen 1977
J. Janhunen. Samojedischer Wortschatz: Gemeinsamojedische Etymologien. (Castrenianum Toimitteita, 17). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1977.
Janhunen 1998
J. Janhunen. Samoyedic. D. Abondolo (ed.). The Uralic Languages. London; New York: Routledge, 1998. P. 457–479.
Katzschmann 2008
M. Katzschmann. Chrestomathia Nganasanica. Texte. Übersetzung. Glossar. Grammatik. Norderstedt: Books on Demand GmbH, 2008.
Khanina, Shluinsky 2019
O. Khanina, A. Shluinsky. Intransitive verbs in Enets: A contribution to the typology of split intransitivity. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft. 2019. Vol. 38. Iss. 1. P. 1–36. DOI: 10.1515/zfs-2019-0001.
Khanina, Shluinsky 2023
O. Khanina, A. Shluinsky. Enets. D. Abondolo, R. Välijärvi (eds.). The Uralic languages: 2nd edition. Abingdon: Routledge, 2023. P. 793–852. DOI: 10.4324/9781315625096-18.
Körtvély 2005
É. Körtvély. Verb conjugation in Tundra Nenets. (Studia Uralo-Altaica. Vol. 46). Szeged: SZTE Finnugor Tanszék, 2005.
Künnap 1971
A. Künnap. System und Ursprung der kamassischen Flexionssuffixe. Vol. 1. Numeruszeichen und Nominalflexion. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1978.
Künnap 1978
A. Künnap. System und Ursprung der kamassischen Flexionssuffixe. Vol. 2. Verbalflexion und Verbalnomina. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1978.
Mikola 2004
T. Mikola. Studien zur Geschichte der Samojedischen Sprachen. Aus dem Nachlass herausgegeben von Beáta Wagner-Nagy. (Studia Uralo-Altaica. Vol. 45). Szeged: SzTE Finnisch-Ugrisches Institut, 2004.
OchSYa 1980
A. I. Kuznetsova, Ye. A. Khelimskiy, Ye. V. Grushkina. Ocherki po selkupskomu yazyku. Tazovskiy dialekt [An outline of Selkup language. Taz dialect]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Moscow State University Press, 1980.
Salminen 1997
T. Salminen. Tundra Nenets inflection. (Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia. Vol. 227). Helsinki: Suomаlais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1997.
Salminen 1998
T. Salminen. A morphological dictionary of Tundra Nenets. (Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae. Vol. 26). Helsinki: Suomаlais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1998.
Wagner-Nagy 2018
B. Wagner-Nagy. A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
Keywords
Samoyedic languages, verbal conjugation, linguistic reconstruction
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus