DOI:10.30842/alp23065737202136167
Budennaya Ye. V. Osobennosti
upotrebleniya subyektnykh mestoimeniy v ingermanlandskom finskom
yazyke. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2024. 20(2):
136–167.
The article addresses the issue of use/omission of subject
pronouns in Ingrian Finnish. The data comes from prose fiction by
V. Valjakka and P. Mutanen, previously not used for any linguistic
analysis, and from oral narratives recorded under the supervision
of Irma Mullonen. Both fiction and oral narratives come from two
different dialectal areas of Ingrian Finnish, the East and the West
of the Gatchina District, respectively. The study relied on corpus
analysis whereby fiction and oral narrative texts were compared to
each other and to the dialects they come from.
The study revealed the following characteristic features of the
Ingrian Finnish subject reference. First, subject pronouns in
Ingrian Finnish tend to be explicitly ex pressed in all persons,
which distinguishes it from Standard Finnish where the 1st and 2nd
person subject pronouns are usually omitted. At the same time, the
Ingrian Finnish pattern differs from Russian, where pronouns are
omitted much less frequently. Some pronominal features of Ingrian
Finnish, such as the omission of the 3rd person pronouns in
independent foreground narrative clauses may result from contacts
with Russian. Second, a set of Ingrian Finnish verbs of speech and
thinking are mostly used without an additional subject pronoun,
which distinguishes the Ingrian Finnish situation from Russian,
where the pronoun is usually expressed in such contexts. Third,
while in past clauses of Ingrian Finnish oral narratives the 1st
and 2nd person subject pronouns are usually expressed, in fiction
prose they tend to be omitted. This difference can be explained
both by the general pragmatics of the recording (pronouns were used
as a marker of politeness, necessary for correct interaction
between the speaker and the listener) and by its design (unlike in
fiction examples, language consultants used longer clauses to
provide more detail).
Keywords
Ingrian Finnish, subject pronoun, personal
pronoun, pronoun omission, East Gatchina dialect, West Gatchina
dialect
References
Budennaya 2019
E. V. Budennaya. Subyektnaya
referentsiya v izhorskom i vodskom yazykakh: iz istorii odnogo
zaimstvovaniya [Subject reference in Ingrian and Votic: from the
history of one borrowing of pattern]. Ural-Altaic Studies.
2019. Vol. 4. Iss. 35. P. 36–52.
Budennaya 2020
E. V. Budennaya. Subyekt
nastoyashchego vremeni v ustnykh i pismennykh narrativakh [The
present subject in oral and written narratives]. A. A. Kibrik, X.
P. Semionova, D. V. Sitchinava, S. G. Tatevosov, A. Ju.
Urmanchieva. VAProsy yazykoznaniya: Megasbornik nanostatey
[VAProsy yazykoznaniya: megaсollection of nanopapers]. Moscow:
Buki-Vedi, 2020. P. 648–653.
Duvallon, Chalvin 2004
O. Duvallon, A. Chalvin. La
réalisation zéro du pronom sujet de première et de deuxième
personne du singulier en finnois et en eston ien parlés.
Linguistica Uralica. 2004. Vol. XL. Iss. 4. P. 270–286.
DOI:10.3176/lu.2004.4.04.
Frascarelli 2007
M. Frascarelli. Subjects, topics and
the interpretation of referential pro: an interface approach to the
linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory. 2007. Vol. 25. P. 691–734. DOI:
10.1007/s11049-007-9025-x.
Fougeron, Breuillard 2004
I. Fougeron, J. Breuillard.
Mestoimenie “ya” I postroenie diskursivnykh svyazey v sovremennom
russkom yazyke [The pronoun “ja” and the construction of discourse
links in Modern Russian]. T. M. Nikolaeva (ed.). Verbalnaya i
neverbalnaya opory prostranstva mezhfrazovykh svyazey [Verbal
and nonverbal support of interphrase connections]. Moscow: Yazyki
slavyanskoy kultury, 2004. P. 147–166.
Galakhova 1977
L. Ja. Galakhova. Soglasnyye v kontse
slova v finskikh govorakh Leningradskoy oblasti [End consonants at
the end of words in Finnish dialects of the Leningrad Region].
Voprosy finno-ugorskoy filologii. 1977. Vol. 3. P.
16–34.
Galakhova 1990
L. Ja. Galakhova. Lichnyye i
vremennyye formy glagola v finskikh govorakh Leningradskoy oblasti
[Personal and tense forms of the verb in Finnish dialects of the
Leningrad Region]. Voprosy finno-ugorskoy filologii. 1990.
Vol. 5. P. 16–34.
Grenoble 2001
L. Grenoble. Conceptual reference
points, pronouns and conversational structure in Russian.
Glossos 1. 2001. Available at:
http://www.seelrc.org/glossos/issues/1/grenoble.pdf (accessed on
1.11.2024).
Hakulinen 1979
L. Hakulinen. Suomen kielen
rakenne ja kehitys [The structure and development of the
Finnish language]. Keuruu: Otavan korkeakoulukirjasto, 1979.
ISK 2004
A. Hakulinen, M. Vilkuna, R.
Korhonen, V. Koivisto, T. R. Heinonen, I. Alho. Iso suomen
kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomen kirjallisuuden seura, 2004.
Available at: https://kaino.kotus.fi/visk/etusivu.php (accessed on
1.11.2024).
Heinonen 1995
T. Heinonen. Null Subjects in
Finnish: From Either-Or to More-Or-Less. Unpublished
manuscript. Research Institute for the Languages of Finland,
1995.
Helasvuo 2006
M.-L. Helasvuo. Passive: personal or
impersonal? A Finnish perspective. M.-L. Helasvuo, L. Campbell
(eds.). Grammar from the human perspective: case, space and
person in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. P.
233–255. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.277.16hel.
Holmberg 2005
A. Holmberg. Is there a little pro?
Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry. 2005. Vol. 36.
Iss. 4. P. 533–564. DOI: 10.1162/002438905774464322.
Holmberg 2016
A. Holmberg. Null subjects in Finnish
and the typology of pro drop. A. Tamm, A. Vainikka (eds.).
Uralic syntax. Oxford: Oxford Universiry Press (to
appear). Available at:
https://andersholmberg92428242.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/holmberg-to-appear.-null-subjects-in-finnish-and-the-typology-of-pro-drop.pdf
(accessed on 1.11.2024).
Kibrik 1996
A. A. Kibrik. Anaphora in Russian
narrative discourse: A cognitive calculative account. B. A. Fox
(ed.). Studies in anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
1996. P. 255–304.
Kibrik 2013
A. A. Kibrik. Peculiarities and
origins of the Russian referential system. D. Bakker, M. Haspelmath
(eds.). Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna
Siewierska. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. P. 227–263. DOI:
10.1515/9783110331127.227.
Koppaleva 1998
Yu. E. Koppaleva. Finskie govory
Ingermanlandii [Finnish sub dialects in Ingria]. Finny v
Rossii: Istoriya, kultura, sudby [Finns in Russia: History,
culture, fate]. Petrozavodsk: Publishing House of Petrozavodsk
University, 1998. P. 88–94.
Koppaleva 2007
Yu. E. Koppaleva. Finskaya
narodnaya leksika flory (stanovlenie i funktsionirovanie)
[Finnish folk vocabulary of flora (formation and functioning)].
Petrozavodsk: Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of
Sciences, 2007.
Kuznetsova et al. 2015
N. Kuznetsova, E. Markus, M.
Muslimov. Finnic minorities of Ingria: The current sociolinguistic
situation and its background. H. Marten, M. Riessler, J. Saarikivi,
R. Toivanen (eds.). Cultural and linguistic minorities in the
Russian Federation and the European Union. (Multilingual
Education. Vol. 13: Comparative studies on equality and diversity.)
Berlin: Springer, 2015. P. 127–167. DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-10455-3_6.
Madariaga 2018
N. Madariaga. Diachronic change and
the nature of pronominal null subjects: the case of Russian. J.
Casalicchio, F. Cognola (eds.). Null Subjects in Generative
Grammar. A synchronic and diachronic perspective. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2018. P. 171–198. DOI:
10.1093/oso/9780198815853.003.0007.
Matras, Sakel 2007
Y. Matras, J. Sakel. The
borrowability of grammatical categories. Y. Matras, J. Sakel
(eds.). Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic
perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007. P. 31–74. DOI:
10.1515/9783110199192.31.
McShane 2009
McShane. Subject ellipsis in Russian
and Polish. Studia Linguistica. 2009. Vol. 63. Iss. 1
(Special Issue on Partial Pro-Drop). P. 98–132. DOI:
10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01155.x.
Muslimov 2009
M. Z. Muslimov. K klassifikatsii
finskikh dialektov Ingermanlandii [On the classification of Finnish
dialects of Ingria]. S. A. Myznikov (ed.). Voprosy uralistiki
2009. Nauchnyy almanakh [Topics in Uralistics 2009. Almanac].
St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2009. P. 179–204.
Mustonen 1931
J. Mustonen. Inkerin suomalaiset
saurakunnat. Helsinki: Suoma laisen Kirjallisuuden Seura,
1931.
Ollikainen 2003
V. M. Ollikainen (comp.). Slovar
severno-ingermanlandskikh govorov finskogo yazyka (govory vuole i
koltushskiy) [Dictionary of North Ingrian Finnish varieties
(Vuole and Koltushi varieties)]. (Kotimaisten kielten tutkimusk
eskuksen julkaisuja, 127). Vantaa: Kotimaisten kielten
tutkimuskeskus; Institute of Language and Literature of the
Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Press, 2003.
Rizzi 1986
L. Rizzi. Null Objects in Italian and
the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry. 1986. Vol. 17. P.
501–557.
Seo 2001
S. Seo. The frequency of null
subjects in Russian, Polish, Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian: An
analysis according morphosyntactic environments. PhD thesis.
Bloomington: Dept. of Slavic languages and literatures, Indiana
University, 2001.
Siewierska 2004
A. Siewierska. Person.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI:
10.1017/CBO9780511812729.
Vainikka, Levy 1999
A. Vainikka, Y. Levy. Empty subjects
in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory. 1999. Vol. 17. P. 613–671.
Virtaranta 1953
P. Virtaranta. Näytteitä Inkerin
murteista. Virittäjä. 1953. Vol. 57. Iss. 3. P.
384–405.
Zdorenko 2010
T. Zdorenko. Subject omission in
Russian: a study of the Russian National Corpus. S. Gries, S.
Wulff, M. Davies (eds.). Corpus Linguistics Applications:
current studies, new directions. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010. P.
119–133. DOI: 10.1163/9789042028012_009.