ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

Subject pronouns in Ingrian Finnish

DOI:10.30842/alp23065737202136167
PDF, 550.82 kb
Budennaya Ye. V. Osobennosti upotrebleniya subyektnykh mestoimeniy v ingermanlandskom finskom yazyke. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2024. 20(2): 136–167.

The article addresses the issue of use/omission of subject pronouns in Ingrian Finnish. The data comes from prose fiction by V. Valjakka and P. Mutanen, previously not used for any linguistic analysis, and from oral narratives recorded under the supervision of Irma Mullonen. Both fiction and oral narratives come from two different dialectal areas of Ingrian Finnish, the East and the West of the Gatchina District, respectively. The study relied on corpus analysis whereby fiction and oral narrative texts were compared to each other and to the dialects they come from.

The study revealed the following characteristic features of the Ingrian Finnish subject reference. First, subject pronouns in Ingrian Finnish tend to be explicitly ex pressed in all persons, which distinguishes it from Standard Finnish where the 1st and 2nd person subject pronouns are usually omitted. At the same time, the Ingrian Finnish pattern differs from Russian, where pronouns are omitted much less frequently. Some pronominal features of Ingrian Finnish, such as the omission of the 3rd person pronouns in independent foreground narrative clauses may result from contacts with Russian. Second, a set of Ingrian Finnish verbs of speech and thinking are mostly used without an additional subject pronoun, which distinguishes the Ingrian Finnish situation from Russian, where the pronoun is usually expressed in such contexts. Third, while in past clauses of Ingrian Finnish oral narratives the 1st and 2nd person subject pronouns are usually expressed, in fiction prose they tend to be omitted. This difference can be explained both by the general pragmatics of the recording (pronouns were used as a marker of politeness, necessary for correct interaction between the speaker and the listener) and by its design (unlike in fiction examples, language consultants used longer clauses to provide more detail).

Keywords
Ingrian Finnish, subject pronoun, personal pronoun, pronoun omission, East Gatchina dialect, West Gatchina dialect
References
Budennaya 2019
E. V. Budennaya. Subyektnaya referentsiya v izhorskom i vodskom yazykakh: iz istorii odnogo zaimstvovaniya [Subject reference in Ingrian and Votic: from the history of one borrowing of pattern]. Ural-Altaic Studies. 2019. Vol. 4. Iss. 35. P. 36–52.
Budennaya 2020
E. V. Budennaya. Subyekt nastoyashchego vremeni v ustnykh i pismennykh narrativakh [The present subject in oral and written narratives]. A. A. Kibrik, X. P. Semionova, D. V. Sitchinava, S. G. Tatevosov, A. Ju. Urmanchieva. VAProsy yazykoznaniya: Megasbornik nanostatey [VAProsy yazykoznaniya: megaсollection of nanopapers]. Moscow: Buki-Vedi, 2020. P. 648–653.
Duvallon, Chalvin 2004
O. Duvallon, A. Chalvin. La réalisation zéro du pronom sujet de première et de deuxième personne du singulier en finnois et en eston ien parlés. Linguistica Uralica. 2004. Vol. XL. Iss. 4. P. 270–286. DOI:10.3176/lu.2004.4.04.
Frascarelli 2007
M. Frascarelli. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: an interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 2007. Vol. 25. P. 691–734. DOI: 10.1007/s11049-007-9025-x.
Fougeron, Breuillard 2004
I. Fougeron, J. Breuillard. Mestoimenie “ya” I postroenie diskursivnykh svyazey v sovremennom russkom yazyke [The pronoun “ja” and the construction of discourse links in Modern Russian]. T. M. Nikolaeva (ed.). Verbalnaya i neverbalnaya opory prostranstva mezhfrazovykh svyazey [Verbal and nonverbal support of interphrase connections]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury, 2004. P. 147–166.
Galakhova 1977
L. Ja. Galakhova. Soglasnyye v kontse slova v finskikh govorakh Leningradskoy oblasti [End consonants at the end of words in Finnish dialects of the Leningrad Region]. Voprosy finno-ugorskoy filologii. 1977. Vol. 3. P. 16–34.
Galakhova 1990
L. Ja. Galakhova. Lichnyye i vremennyye formy glagola v finskikh govorakh Leningradskoy oblasti [Personal and tense forms of the verb in Finnish dialects of the Leningrad Region]. Voprosy finno-ugorskoy filologii. 1990. Vol. 5. P. 16–34.
Grenoble 2001
L. Grenoble. Conceptual reference points, pronouns and conversational structure in Russian. Glossos 1. 2001. Available at: http://www.seelrc.org/glossos/issues/1/grenoble.pdf (accessed on 1.11.2024).
Hakulinen 1979
L. Hakulinen. Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys [The structure and development of the Finnish language]. Keuruu: Otavan korkeakoulukirjasto, 1979.
ISK 2004
A. Hakulinen, M. Vilkuna, R. Korhonen, V. Koivisto, T. R. Heinonen, I. Alho. Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomen kirjallisuuden seura, 2004. Available at: https://kaino.kotus.fi/visk/etusivu.php (accessed on 1.11.2024).
Heinonen 1995
T. Heinonen. Null Subjects in Finnish: From Either-Or to More-Or-Less. Unpublished manuscript. Research Institute for the Languages of Finland, 1995.
Helasvuo 2006
M.-L. Helasvuo. Passive: personal or impersonal? A Finnish perspective. M.-L. Helasvuo, L. Campbell (eds.). Grammar from the human perspective: case, space and person in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. P. 233–255. DOI: 10.1075/cilt.277.16hel.
Holmberg 2005
A. Holmberg. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry. 2005. Vol. 36. Iss. 4. P. 533–564. DOI: 10.1162/002438905774464322.
Holmberg 2016
A. Holmberg. Null subjects in Finnish and the typology of pro drop. A. Tamm, A. Vainikka (eds.). Uralic syntax. Oxford: Oxford Universiry Press (to appear). Available at: https://andersholmberg92428242.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/holmberg-to-appear.-null-subjects-in-finnish-and-the-typology-of-pro-drop.pdf (accessed on 1.11.2024).
Kibrik 1996
A. A. Kibrik. Anaphora in Russian narrative discourse: A cognitive calculative account. B. A. Fox (ed.). Studies in anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996. P. 255–304.
Kibrik 2013
A. A. Kibrik. Peculiarities and origins of the Russian referential system. D. Bakker, M. Haspelmath (eds.). Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. P. 227–263. DOI: 10.1515/9783110331127.227.
Koppaleva 1998
Yu. E. Koppaleva. Finskie govory Ingermanlandii [Finnish sub dialects in Ingria]. Finny v Rossii: Istoriya, kultura, sudby [Finns in Russia: History, culture, fate]. Petrozavodsk: Publishing House of Petrozavodsk University, 1998. P. 88–94.
Koppaleva 2007
Yu. E. Koppaleva. Finskaya narodnaya leksika flory (stanovlenie i funktsionirovanie) [Finnish folk vocabulary of flora (formation and functioning)]. Petrozavodsk: Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2007.
Kuznetsova et al. 2015
N. Kuznetsova, E. Markus, M. Muslimov. Finnic minorities of Ingria: The current sociolinguistic situation and its background. H. Marten, M. Riessler, J. Saarikivi, R. Toivanen (eds.). Cultural and linguistic minorities in the Russian Federation and the European Union. (Multilingual Education. Vol. 13: Comparative studies on equality and diversity.) Berlin: Springer, 2015. P. 127–167. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10455-3_6.
Madariaga 2018
N. Madariaga. Diachronic change and the nature of pronominal null subjects: the case of Russian. J. Casalicchio, F. Cognola (eds.). Null Subjects in Generative Grammar. A synchronic and diachronic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. P. 171–198. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198815853.003.0007.
Matras, Sakel 2007
Y. Matras, J. Sakel. The borrowability of grammatical categories. Y. Matras, J. Sakel (eds.). Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007. P. 31–74. DOI: 10.1515/9783110199192.31.
McShane 2009
McShane. Subject ellipsis in Russian and Polish. Studia Linguistica. 2009. Vol. 63. Iss. 1 (Special Issue on Partial Pro-Drop). P. 98–132. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01155.x.
Muslimov 2009
M. Z. Muslimov. K klassifikatsii finskikh dialektov Ingermanlandii [On the classification of Finnish dialects of Ingria]. S. A. Myznikov (ed.). Voprosy uralistiki 2009. Nauchnyy almanakh [Topics in Uralistics 2009. Almanac]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2009. P. 179–204.
Mustonen 1931
J. Mustonen. Inkerin suomalaiset saurakunnat. Helsinki: Suoma laisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, 1931.
Ollikainen 2003
V. M. Ollikainen (comp.). Slovar severno-ingermanlandskikh govorov finskogo yazyka (govory vuole i koltushskiy) [Dictionary of North Ingrian Finnish varieties (Vuole and Koltushi varieties)]. (Kotimaisten kielten tutkimusk eskuksen julkaisuja, 127). Vantaa: Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus; Institute of Language and Literature of the Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Press, 2003.
Rizzi 1986
L. Rizzi. Null Objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry. 1986. Vol. 17. P. 501–557.
Seo 2001
S. Seo. The frequency of null subjects in Russian, Polish, Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian: An analysis according morphosyntactic environments. PhD thesis. Bloomington: Dept. of Slavic languages and literatures, Indiana University, 2001.
Siewierska 2004
A. Siewierska. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511812729.
Vainikka, Levy 1999
A. Vainikka, Y. Levy. Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 1999. Vol. 17. P. 613–671.
Virtaranta 1953
P. Virtaranta. Näytteitä Inkerin murteista. Virittäjä. 1953. Vol. 57. Iss. 3. P. 384–405.
Zdorenko 2010
T. Zdorenko. Subject omission in Russian: a study of the Russian National Corpus. S. Gries, S. Wulff, M. Davies (eds.). Corpus Linguistics Applications: current studies, new directions. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010. P. 119–133. DOI: 10.1163/9789042028012_009.
Keywords
Ingrian Finnish, subject pronoun, personal pronoun, pronoun omission, East Gatchina dialect, West Gatchina dialect
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus