ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

On the relationship between grammaticalization of a subordinator and integration of a clause: A case study of Russian clauses of temporal subsequence

DOI:10.30842/alp23065737201187226
PDF, 529 kb
Pekelis O. Ye. O svyazi mezhdu grammatikalizatsiyey soyuza i integratsiyey klauzy (na primere russkikh soyuzov sledovaniya). Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 187–226.

This paper investigates Russian clauses of temporal subsequence, introduced by the subordinators prežde čem, ran’še čem, pered tem kak, and do togo kak, in terms of their syntactic integration with the host clause. Based on Russian National Corpus data, the paper verifies the hypothesis that there exists a correlation between the degree of integration and the degree of grammaticalization: the less an adverbial subordinator is grammaticalized, the stronger is its integration with the host clause. To test this hypothesis, the above subordinators were compared by the degree of their grammaticalization. The three criteria of grammaticalization selected were the frequency of the so-called split usage of the subordinators, the frequency of their uses with non-predicative constituents, and their ability to take modifiers. The degree of integration was tested based on the well-known distinction between central, peripheral, and non-integrated adverbial clauses, as well as on the formal traits associated with each type. The resulting two grammaticalization and integration scales show that the subordinators are arranged in them in the reverse order with respect to each other. Even a cursory glance at the three other semantic classes of adverbial (conditional, causal, and concessive) clauses, as well as at the discourse markers deriving from the adverbial subordinators, suggests the existence of an inverse relationship between the degree of grammaticalization and the degree of integration. This relationship appears thus to represent a more general tendency characterizing the movement of a linguistic item along the scale vocabulary > grammar > discourse. Along the way, the study demonstrates that Russian clauses of temporal subsequence may show both the minimum and the maximum degree of integration. This runs contrary to the generally accepted view that temporal clauses are associated with a high degree of integration.

Keywords
adverbial clause, temporal clause, Russian, grammaticalization, subordination, discourse marker, corpus studies
References
Apresyan 2015
V. Yu. Apresyan. Ustupitelnost: mekhanismy obrazovaniya i vzaimodeystviya slozhnykh znacheniy v yazyke [Concessivity: mechanisms of formation and interaction of complex meanings in language]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury, 2015.
Badan, Haegeman 2022
L. Badan, L. Haegeman. The syntax of peripheral adverbial clauses. Journal of Linguistics. 2022. Vol. 58. Iss. 4. P. 697–738. DOI: 10.1017/S0022226721000463.
Barentsen, Pupynin 1999
A. Barentsen, Ju. Pupynin. O soyuzakh predshestvovaniya v russkom i angliyskom yazykakh [On conjunctions of anteriority in Russian and English]. Zb. Greń, V. Koseska-Toszewa (eds.). Semantyka a konfrontacja językowa 2. Warszawa: Slawistyczny ośrodek wydamniczy, 1999. P. 105–122.
Belyaev 2015
O. Belyaev. Cause in Russian and the formal typology of coordination and subordination. P. Arkadiev, I. Kapitonov, Yu. Lander, E. Rakhilina, S. Tatevosov (eds.). Donum semanticum: Opera linguistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discipulis amicisque Rossicis oblata. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, 2015. P. 35–66.
Cinque 1999
G. Cinque. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Dobrushina 2014
N. R. Dobrushina. Imperativ. Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoy grammatiki [Imperative. Towards a corpus description of Russian grammar]. Available at: http://rusgram.ru (accessed 01.02.2023).
Endo 2012
Y. Endo. The syntax discourse interface in adverbial clauses. A. Lobke, L. Haegeman, R. Nye (eds.). Main clause phenomena: New horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012. P. 365–384.
Fasmer 1987а
M. Fasmer. Etimologicheskiy slovar russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of Russian]. Vol. 3. Moscow: Progress, 1987.
Fasmer 1987b
M. Fasmer. Etimologicheskiy slovar russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of Russian]. Vol. 4. Moscow: Progress, 1987.
Frey 2012
W. Frey. On two types of adverbial clauses allowing root-phenomena. A. Lobke, L. Haegeman, R. Nye (eds.). Main clause phenomena: New horizons. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2012. P. 405–429.
Frey 2016
W. Frey. On some correlations between formal and interpretative properties of causal clauses. I. Reich, A. Speyer (eds.). Co- and subordination in German and other languages. (Special issue of Linguistische Berichte 21). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag, 2016. P. 153–179.
Frey 2023
W. Frey. On the categorical status of different dependent clauses. J. M. Hartmann, A. Wöllstein (eds.). Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional Arguments in Cross-Linguistic Research: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. (Studien zur deutschen Sprache 84). Tübingen: Narr, 2023. P. 364–410.
Günthner, Mutz 2004
S. Günthner, K. Mutz. Grammaticalization vs. pragmaticalization? The development of pragmatic markers in German and Italian. W. Bisang, N. Himmelmann, B. Wiemer (eds.). What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004. P. 77–107.
Haegeman 2003
L. Haegeman. The syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicalization. M. Coene, G. De Cuyper, Y. D’Hulst (eds.). Current Studies in Comparative Romance Linguistics. (APiL 107). Antwerp: University of Antwerp, 2003. P. 61–90.
Harris, Campbell 1995
A. C. Harris, L. Campbell. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620553.
Heine et al. 2021
B. Heine, G. Kaltenböck, T. Kuteva, H. Long. The Rise of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. DOI: 10.1017/9781108982856.
Khalizeva, 1969
V. Khalizeva. Semanticheskiy analiz soyuzov predshestvovaniya [Semantic analysis of conjunctions of anteriority]. Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom. 1969. No. 2. P. 77–82.
Kholodilova 2021
M. A. Kholodilova. Grammaticalization of multi-word causal subordinators in Slavic languages. A. Ju. Rusakov, V. A. Stegnij (eds.). Causal constructions in the world’s languages (synchrony, diachrony, typology). Book of Abstracts. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2021.
Khrakovskij 2005
V. S. Khrakovskij. Taksis sledovaniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Taxis of following in modern Russian]. A. V. Bondarko (ed.). Problemy funktsionalnoy grammatiki. Polevye struktury [Problems of functional grammar. Field structures]. St. Peterburg: Nauka, 2005. P. 29–85.
Krifka 2013
M. Krifka. Response particles as propositional anaphors. S. Todd (ed.). Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 23. Washington, D. C.: LSA Open Journal Systems. P. 1–18. DOI: 10.3765/salt.v0i0.2676.
Lavrov 1941
B. V. Lavrov. Uslovnye i ustupitelnye predlozheniya v drevnerusskom yazyke [Conditional and concessive clauses in Old Russian]. Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1941.
Narrog, Heine 2021
H. Narrog, B. Heine. Grammaticalization. (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Norde 2009
M. Norde. Degrammaticalization Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
NOSS 2004
Yu. D. Apresyan (ed.). Novyy obyasnitelnyy slovar sinonimov [A new explanatory dictionary of synonyms of the Russian language]. 2nd edition, revised. Moscow; Vienna: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury; Venskiy slavisticheskiy almanakh, 2004.
Ocampo 2006
F. Ocampo. Movement towards discourse is not grammaticalization: The evolution of claro from adjective to discourse particle in spoken Spanish. N. Sagarra, A. J. Toribio (eds.). Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2006. P. 308–319.
Paducheva 1977
E. V. Paducheva. Ponyatie prezumptsii v lingvisticheskoy semantike [The concept of presupposition in linguistic semantics]. A. I. Mikhajlova (ed.). Semiotika i informatika [Semiotics and informatics]. Vol. 8. Moscow: All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information, 1977. P. 91–124.
Paducheva 1985
E. V. Paducheva. Vyskazyvanie i yego sootnesennost s deystvitelnostyu [Utterance and its relationship to reality]. Moscow: Nauka, 1985.
Pekelis 2022
O. Pekelis. On the oppositions that underlie the distinctions displayed by Russian causal clauses. Linguistics. 2022. Vol. 60. No. 5. P. 1399–1449. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2020-0151.
Pekelis 2017
O. E. Pekelis. Prichinnye pridatochnye [Causal clauses]. V. A. Plungjan, N. M. Stojnova (eds.). Materialy k Korpusnoy grammatike russkogo yazyka. Vypusk II. Sintaksicheskie konstruktsii i grammaticheskie kategorii [Towards a corpus description of Russian grammar. Iss. II. Syntactic constructions and grammatical categories]. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2017. P. 55–131.
Podlesskaja, Kibrik 2009
V. I. Podlesskaja, A. A. Kibrik. Rechevye sboi i zatrudneniya [Speech disfluences]. A. A. Kibrik, V. I. Podlesskaja (eds.). Rasskazy o snovideniyakh: korpusnoe issledovanie ustnogo russkogo diskursa [Night dream stories: A corpus study of spoken Russian discourse]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, 2009. P. 177–218.
Rizzi 1997
L. Rizzi. The fine structure of the left periphery. L. Haegeman (ed.). Elements of grammar:A handbook of generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997. P. 281–337.
Ross 1967
J. R. Ross. Constraints on variables in syntax. Thesis. Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Dept. of Modern Languages and Linguistics, 1967. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15166 (accessed 20.01.2023).
Speyer, Voigtmann 2023
A. Speyer, S. Voigtmann. Factors for the integration of causal clauses in the history of German. L. Jędrzejowski, C. Fleczoreck (eds.). Micro- and Macro-variation of Causal Clauses: Synchronic and Diachronic Insights. (Studies in Language Companion Series 231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2023. P. 311–345. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.231.11spe.
Sweetser 1990
E. Sweetser. From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904.
Testelec 2001
Ja. G. Testelec. Vvedenie v obshchiy sintaksis [Introduction to general syntax]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Russian State University for the Humanities, 2001.
Traugott 2003
E. Traugott. Constructions in grammaticalization. B. D. Joseph, R. Janda (eds.). Handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. P. 624–647.
Vinogradov, Shvedova 1964
V. V. Vinogradov, N. Ju. Shvedova. Ocherki po istoricheskoy grammatike russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XIX veka. Glagol, narechie, predlogi, soyuzy v russkom literaturnom yazyke XIX veka [Essays on the historical grammar of the Russian literary language of the 19th century. Verb, adverb, prepositions and conjunctions in the Russian literary language of the 19th century]. Moscow: Nauka, 1964.
Keywords
adverbial clause, temporal clause, Russian, grammaticalization, subordination, discourse marker, corpus studies
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus