ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

Charms in German judicial acts of the 16th–17th centuries: pragmatics of language variation

DOI:10.30842/alp230657371823960
PDF, 917.8 kb
Karpov V. I. Zagovornyye teksty v nemetskikh sudebnykh aktakh XVI–XVII vv.: pragmaticheskiy aspekt yazykovogo varirovaniya. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2022. 18(2): 39–60.

The paper proposes a linguistic analysis of interrogation files from witch processes of the late 16th — the first half of the 17th centuries in Germany. It focuses on documents that include charm texts as core evidence against those accused of witchcraft. Charms formulae were largely recorded in judicial acts as additional corroborative material evidence of socially dangerous practices by a given group of individuals. However, before charm texts found their way into interrogation files as official evidence, local offices had had a hard and long time to both standardize their judicial practices and normalize the paperwork. The transition to the national language standard initially caused massive confusion as court officers would spontaneously switch from Standard German to the local dialect in their paperwork. This competition between Standard German and local dialects gave rise to medial diglossia, with the choice of a given linguistic variant contingent on a variety of factors. In many cases, witchcraft trial materials would be sent to law faculties of universities or to higher jurisdiction courts of imperial cities for legal assessment of the offenders' testimony. This made it necessary for court recorders, instead of putting the evidence down directly in the local dialect, to translate it into the established official bureaucratese. The most intricate task was for the recorders to translate the defendants' replies and the charms' formulae, naturally given in the local dialect. The paper describes the phenomenon of code-switching as evidenced in court records featuring charms as their structural elements. In gathering the data, the focus was on the Low German dialect area and the last phase of the Early New High German period.

Keywords
textual criticism, history of language, dialectology, folklore, charms, code-switching
References
Bondarko 2011
N. A. Bondarko. Vzaimodeystvie ustnoy i pismennoy traditsiy v nemetskikh meditativnykh molitvakh XIII–XIV vekov [Interaction of oral and written traditions in German meditative prayers of the 13th–14th centuries]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2011. Vol. VII. Iss. 1. P. 573–613.
Zhirmunskij 1956
V. M. Zhirmunskij. Nemetskaya dialektologiya [German Dialectology]. Moscow; Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House, 1956.
Karpov 2020
V. I. Karpov. Folklor i knizhnaya kultura v Germanii Novogo vremeni (na primere sbornikov nemetskikh zagovorov XVI–XX vv.) [Folklore and book culture in Germany of New Age (the Case of collection of medical charms, the 16th–20th centuries)]. Research result. Theoretical and applied linguistics. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 122–132.
Besch, Wolf 2009
W. Besch, N. Wolf. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Längschnitte—Zeitstufen—Linguistische Studien. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 2009.
Deutsche Kanzleisprache
J. Macha (ed.). Deutsche Kanzleisprache in Hexenverhörprotokollen der Frühen Neuzeit. Bd. 1: Auswahledition. Bd. 2: Kommentierte Bibliographie zur regionalen Hexenforschung. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 2005.
Grimm 1878
J. Grimm. Deutsche Mythologie. Vierte Ausgabe. III. Bd. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmlers Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1878.
Hille 2009
I. Hille. Der Teufelspakt in frühneuzeitlichen Verhörprotokollen: Standardisierung und Regionalisierung im Frühneuhochdeutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009.
Loetz 2002
F. Loetz. Mit Gott handeln: von den Zürcher Gotteslästerern der Frühen Neuzeit zu einer Kulturgeschichte des Religiösen. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002.
Macha 2008
J. Macha. Regionalität und Syntax: Redewiedergabe in frühneuhochdeutschen Verhörprotokollen. R. Berthele, H. Christen, S. Germann, I. Hove (eds.). Die deutsche Schriftsprache und die Regionen. Entstehungsgeschichtliche Fragen in neuer Sicht. (Studia Linguistica Germanica 65). Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 2008. P. 181–202.
Quensel 2017
S. Quensel. Hexen, Satan, Inquisition. Die Erfindung des Hexen-Problems. Wiesbaden: Springer-Verlag, 2017.
Rösler 1997
I. Rösler. Ich soll als eine Zauberinne vorbrannt werden. Zur Widerspiegelung populären Zauberwissens in mecklenburgischen Hexenprozeßprotokollen und zur Sprachform der Verhörprotokolle. D. Harmening, A. Rudolph (eds.). Hexenverfolgung in Mecklenburg: regionale und überregionale Aspekte. Dettelbach: Verlag Dr. Röll, 1997. P. 167–190.
Rösler 2006
I. Rösler. Sprachwechsel in Mecklenburg. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch. 2006. № 129. P. 139–156.
Schumann 2007
E. Schumann. Beiträge studierter Juristen und anderer Rechtsexperten zur Rezeption des gelehrten Rechts. Jahrbuch der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Goettingen. 2007. Vol. 28. P. 443–461.
Siller 1982
M. Siller. Zauberspruch und Hexenprozeß. Die Rolle des Zauberspruchs in den Zauber- und Hexenprozessen Tirols. W. M. Bauer, A. Masser, G. Plangg (eds.). Tradition und Entwicklung. Festschrift Eugen Thurnher. Innsbruck: Universität Innsbruck Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen, 1982. P. 127–154.
Staak 1931
G. Staak. Beiträge zur magischen Krankheitsbehandlung. Die magische Krankheitsbehandlung in der Gegenwart in Mecklenburg. Wismar: Hermann Rhein Verlag, 1931.
Stegmann 2006
K. Stegmann. Die gefangene leugknet alles. Untersuchungen zu Entstehungsbedingungen und Ausprägungen frühneuzeitlicher Hexenverhörprotokolle. Magisterarbeit der Philosophischen Fakultät der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 2006.
Keywords
textual criticism, history of language, dialectology, folklore, charms, code-switching
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus