ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

Greek μαπ- and its congeners

DOI:10.30842/alp23065737181267281
PDF, 799.41 kb
Nikolaev Alexander. Greek μαπ- and its congeners. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2022. 18(1): 267–281.

Ancient Greek (aor.) μαπέ/ό- 'to seize' ([Hes.] Sc. 231, 252, 304) has not yet received a satisfactory etymology which this paper aims to provide. Ever since antiquity it has been argued that aor. μαπέ/ό- is a secondary replacement of *μαρπέ/ό- made from nearly synonymous and much better attested verb μάρπτω 'seize, overtake, strike' (for which only sigmatic aorist is attested). This view does not carry conviction; the present paper argues that aor. μαπέ/ό- is real and its root μαπ- is distinct from that of μάρπτω for which a new etymological analysis is offered (PIE *merkʷ- 'snatch, take away', Toch. A märk- 'to take away'). My proposal is to view μαπ- as a zero-grade root allomorph *mm̥p- formed from a full-grade root *memp- (< *menp-) cf. παθέ/ό- (< *bʰn̥dʰ-) : πενθ- (< *bʰendʰ-), δρακέ/ό- (< *dr̥ḱ -) : δερκ- (< *derḱ- ), etc. The hypothetical full-grade root *memp- (< *menp-) can be analyzed as a verbal governing compound of PIE *men- 'hand' (Lat. manus 'hand', OIr. muin₂ 'protection', OE mund 'hand', Hitt. maniyaḫḫ - 'to hand over') and the root *h₁ep- 'take' (Lat. coepī 'I began', apiō 'I tie', Hitt. epp-zi 'grabs', Ved. ā́pa 'has reached'): *men-h₁p- 'take with one's hand; seize'. Similar compounds with PIE *men- 'hand' used as the first member are reflected in Lat. mancipium 'laying hold of a thing; ownership' (quasi *men- + *keh₂p-) and mandāre 'to hand over' (quasi *men- + *dʰeh₁-). This nominal compound underlies the neo-root *menh₁p-; compare Ved. gup- 'to protect' (based on the compound go-pā́- 'cow-herd'), Lat. crēd- 'believe' (< *ḱ reds-dʰeh₁-) or PIE *u̯elh₁bʰ- 'speak lies' (< *u̯elh₁-bʰeh₂-). In aor. *(h₁)e-menh₁p-t 'seized' the laryngeal would be lost in a heavy CHCC cluster by Schmidt-Hackstein's rule, hence 3 sg. *(h₁)e-menp-t (> *(h₁)e-memp-t with place assimilation), 3 pl. *(h₁)e-mm̥p-ent, remade as thematic aorist μαπέ/ό-. A neat parallel to the proposed development may be found in another verbal governing compound of PIE date, namely, *men(e)s-dʰh₁- 'to implement thinking' > μενθ- (remade as μανθ-) which in turn engendered a new zero-grade μαθ-.

Keywords
Greek epic poetry, Greek etymology, compounds, formulaic collocations, laryngeal theory, Hittite, Tocharian
References
AleW
Altlitauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. W. Hock, R. Fecht, A. Feulner, H. Helene, E. Hill, D. S. Wodtko (eds.). Version 2.0. URL: https://alew.hu-berlin.de.
Barnes 2011
T. G. Barnes. Homeric ἀνδροτῆτα καὶ ἥβην. Journal of Hellenic Studies. 2011. Vol. 131. P. 1–13.
Beekes 2010
R. S. P. Beekes. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010.
Benveniste 1954
É. Benveniste. Études hittites at indoeuropéennes. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. 1954. Vol. 50. P. 29–43.
Bing 2012
P. Bing. A proto-epyllion? The Pseudo-Hesiodic Shield and the poetics of deferral. M. Baumbach, S. Bär (eds.). Brill's companion to Greek and Latin epyllion and its reception. Leiden: Brill, 212. P. 177–197.
Blanc 1992
A. Blanc. La distribution des biens et des maux: εὐμαρής et la racine *smer-. Revue des Études Grecques. 1992. Vol. 105. P. 548–556.
Blanc 2018
A. Blanc. Les adjectifs sigmatiques du grec ancien: un cas de métamorphisme dérivationnel. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck, 2018.
Bowra 1970
C. M. Bowra. Γλῶσσαι κατὰ πόλεις. C. M. Bowra. On Greek Margins. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970. P. 27–45 (a revised version of the article originally published in Glotta. 1959. Vol. 38. P. 43–60).
Carling 2000
G. Carling. Die Funktionen der lokalen Kasus im Tocharischen. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 2000.
Curtius 1873
G. Curtius. Das Verbum der Griechischen Sprache. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1873.
Čop 1964
B. Čop. Zur hethitischen Schreibung und Lautung. Linguistica. 1964. Vol. 6. P. 37–76.
Egetmeyer 1992
M. Egetmeyer. Wörterbuch zu den Inschriften im kyprischen Syllabar. Unter Berücksichtigung einer Arbeit von Almut Hintze. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 1992.
Ehrlich 1910
H. Ehrlich. Zur indogermanischen Sprachgeschichte. Königsberg, 1910.
Frotscher et al. (in press)
M. Frotscher, G. Kroonen, J. Barðdal. Indo-European inroads into the syntactic–etymological interface: A reconstruction of the PIE verbal root *menkʷ- ‘lack' and its argument structure. Historische Sprachforschung.
García Ramón 2010
J. L. García Ramón. Reconstructing IE lexicon and phraseology: Inherited patterns and lexical renewal. S. W. Jamison, H. C. Melchert, B. Vine (eds.). Proceedings of the 21st Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, October 30th and 31st, 2009. Bremen: Hempen, 2010. P. 69–106.
Gercenberg 1972
L. G. Gercenberg. Morfologicheskaja struktura slova v drevnikh indoevropejskikh jazykakh [The Morphological Structure of the Word in the Ancient Indo-European Languages]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1972.
Gercenberg, Kazansky 2005
L. G. Gercenberg, N. N. Kazansky. Prajazykovaja rekonstrukcija: obshchie problemy [Reconstructing a Proto-Language: General Issues]. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2005. Vol. 75. No. 12. P. 1077–1088.
Gotō 1995
T. Gotō. Griechisch ἐλεφαίρομαι. W. Smoczyński (ed.). Kuryłowicz Memorial Volume. Part One. Cracow: Universitas, 1995. P. 365–370.
Hackstein 2002a
O. Hackstein. Die Sprachform der homerischen Epen: Faktoren morphologischer Variabilität in literarischen Frühformen: Tradition, Sprachwandel, Sprachliche Anachronismen. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2002.
Hackstein 2002b
O. Hackstein. Uridg. CH.CC > C. CC. Historische Sprachforschung. 2002. Vol. 115. P. 1–22.
IG
Inscriptiones Graecae. Vol. 1‒. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1873‒.
Kösling 1998
P. Kösling. Die griechischen primären Jotpräsentien untersucht und dargestellt nach Formenbestand, Aktionsarten und Etymologie. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač, 1998.
Kroonen 2013
G. Kroonen. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Le Feuvre 2015
C. le Feuvre. Homēros dysgnōstos: réinterpretations de termes homériques en grec archaïque et classique. Genève: Librairie Droz, 2015.
Lindner 2018
Th. Lindner. Indogermanische Grammatik. Vol. IV/2: Komposition im Aufriss. Heidelberg: Winter, 2018.
Mahlow 1926
G. Mahlow. Neue Wege durch die Griechische Sprache und Dichtung. Berlin; Leipzig: De Gruyter, 1926.
Malzahn 2010
M. Malzahn. The Tocharian verbal system. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010.
Maslov 2011
B. P. Maslov. The metrical evidence for pre-Mycenaean hexameter epic reconsidered. Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology. 2011. Vol. 15. P. 376–389.
Mason 2015
H. C. Mason. The Hesiodic Aspis: Introduction and commentary on vv. 139–237. D.Phil. Thesis. Oxford University, 2015.
Mayrhofer 1986–2001
M. Mayrhofer. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen. Heidelberg: Winter, 1986–2001.
Meissner 2006
T. Meissner. S-stem nouns and adjectives in Greek and Proto-Indo-European. A diachronic study in word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Nikolaev 2013
A. Nikolaev. The aorist infinitives in -έειν in early Greek hexameter poetry. Journal of Hellenic Studies. 2013. Vol. 133. P. 81–92.
Neri 2013
S. Neri. Zum urindogermanischen Wort für ‘Hand'. A. I. Cooper, J. Rau, M. Weiss (eds.). Multi nominis grammaticus: Studies in Classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday. Ann Arbor; New York: Beech Stave, 2013. P. 185–205.
Opfermann et al. 2022
A. Opfermann, D. Sasseville, R. Süssenguth. Hethitisch māri- ‘Sichelschwert(?)' aus archäologischer, philologischer und etymologischer Sicht. Altorientalische Forschungen. 2022. Vol. 49. P. 104–122.
Pinault 2008
G.-J. Pinault. Chrestomathie tokharienne: textes et grammaire. Leuven: Peeters, 2008.
PMGF
M. Davies (ed.). Poetarum melicorum Graecorum fragmenta. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
Puhvel 2004
J. Puhvel. Vox ex nihilo: Greek ἔγχος. D. Groddek, S. Rößle (eds.). Šarnikzel: Hethitologische Studien zum Gedenken an Emil Orgetorix Forrer 19.02.1894–10.01.1986. Dresden: Verlag der technischen Universität Dresden, 2004. P. 531–532.
Radif 1998
L. Radif. Significato e funzione di alcuni avverbi omerici in -ξ -ψ. U. Rapallo, G. Garbugino (eds.). Grammatica e lessico delle lingue «morte». Alessandria: Ed. dell'Orso, 1998. P. 33–46.
Ranke 1840
C. F. Ranke. Hesiodi quod fertur Scutum Herculis ex recognitione et cum animadversionibus Fr. Aug. Wolfii. Quedlinburg; Leipzig, 1840.
Rikov 2003
G. T. Rikov. Cornish manal ‘sheaf', Latin manus ‘hand' and connected problems. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia. 2003. Vol. 8. P. 149–157.
Ruijgh 1957
C. J. Ruijgh. L'élément achéen dans la langue épique. Assen: van Gorcum, 1957.
Scarlata 1999
S. Scarlata. Die Wurzelkomposita im R̥g-Veda. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1999.
Schindler 1975
J. Schindler. Zum Ablaut der neutralen s-Stämme des Indogermanischen. H. Rix (ed.). Flexion und Wortbildung. Akten der V. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1975. P. 259–267.
Schmidt 1895
J. Schmidt. Kritik der Sonantentheorie. Weimar: Böhlau, 1895.
Schmidt 1973
G. Schmidt. Die iranischen Wörter für “Tochter” und “Vater” und die Reflexe des interkonsonantischen H (ə) in den idg. Sprachen. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung. 1973. Vol. 87. P. 36–83.
Schutzeichel 2014
M. Schutzeichel. Indogermanische Funktionsverbgefüge. Münster: Monsenstein und Vannerdat, 2014.
Schwarz 1932
F. G. Schwarz. De Scuto quod fertur Hesiodi: quaestiones ad compositionem et dicendi genus maxime pertinentes. Berolini: Pilz & Noack, 1932.
Schwyzer 1939
E. Schwyzer. Griechische Grammatik. Vol. 1: Allgemeiner Tell. Lautlehre. Wortbildung. Flexion. München: Beck, 1939.
Spatafora 1997
G. Spatafora. Sul significato di μάψ e dei suoi derivati in età arcaica e classica. Parnassos. 1997. Vol. 39. P. 247–254.
Sitzler 1883
J. Sitzler. Review of T. Bergk. Poetae lyrici Graeci III, 4th ed. Leipzig 1882. Philologische Rundschau. 1883. Vol. 3. Fasc. 30. P. 920–938.
Starke 1986
F. Starke. Review of Chicago Hittite dictionary, vol. 3, fasc. 2. Bibliotheca Orientalis. 1986. Vol. 43. P. 157–165.
Swift 2019
L. Swift. Archilochus: The poems. Introduction, text, translation, and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Tichy 1976
E. Tichy. Gr. δειδέχατο und idg.*dēḱti, déḱtoi. Glotta. 1976. Vol. 54. P. 71–84.
Wachter 2001
R. Wachter. Non-Attic Greek vase inscriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Wackernagel 1914
J. Wackernagel. Akzentstudien III: Zum homerischen Akzent. Göttinginsche Gelehrte Nachrichten. 1914. Vol. 1014. P. 97–130 (reprinted in Kleine Schriften. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1955. Vol. 2. P. 1154–1187).
Weiss 2020
M. Weiss. The inner revolution: old but not that old. M. Serangeli, Th. Olander (eds.). Dispersals and diversification: Linguistic and archaeological perspectives on the early stages of Indo-European. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2020. P. 263–288.
West 1990
M. L. West. Review of Greek Lyric 2. The Classical Review. 1990. Vol. 40. P. 214–216.
Wodtko, Irslinger, Schneider 2008
D. S. Wodtko, B. Irslinger, C. Schneider. Nomina im indogermanischen Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter, 2008.
Keywords
Greek epic poetry, Greek etymology, compounds, formulaic collocations, laryngeal theory, Hittite, Tocharian
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus