ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

The verb aréskein in Ancient Greek: Constructions and semantic change

DOI:10.30842/alp23065737181226245
PDF, 822.8 kb
Luraghi Silvia. The verb aréskein in Ancient Greek: Constructions and semantic change. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2022. 18(1): 226–245.

The paper discusses the diachrony of the semantics and syntax of the verb ἀρέσκειν aréskein. This verb means 'repair, make amend, appease, please' in Homeric Greek, in which it mostly features the aorist stem, and always indicates an inchoative situation. In Homer, it takes an argument structure construction that contains a human first participant encoded in the nominative, and possibly a human second participant encoded in the accusative. Co-occurring dative constituents had inanimate referents and encoded the semantic role of instrument. A single occurrence from Hesiod shows an alternative construction with a partitive genitive in the place of the instrumental dative, which conforms to the construction of verbs of satiation. In Herodotus a new construction appears with a human participant encoded in the dative. The verb ἀρέσκειν aréskein occurs most frequently in the present stem, hence indicating a state. The dative constituent encodes an experiencer and qualifies as first argument in the construction, based on semantic and pragmatic evidence. In such construction the stimulus is generally encoded in the nominative and agrees with the verb, but impersonal occurrences with no nominative constituents are also attested. Attic prose writers feature two constructions containing either a dative or an accusative experiencer accompanied by a nominative stimulus. Both the dative and the accusative experiencers qualify as first argument in most cases. Beside the rise of new argument structure constructions, the verb ἀρέσκειν aréskein also undergoes a semantic change and shifts to the domain of experience. This shift was at its onset in Homeric Greek, in which most occurrences had the meaning 'repair', 'make amend', that did not refer to an experiential situation. This is also shown by the different distribution of aspectual stems in Homer (mostly aorist; no present occurrences) and Herodotus (mostly present).

Keywords
experiential domain, constructions, non-canonical constructions, mental and emotional states
References
Barðdal, Eythórsson 2009
J. Barðdal, Th. Eythórsson. The origin of the oblique-subject construction: an Indo-European comparison. V. Bubenik, S. Rose (eds.) Grammatical change in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2009. P. 179–193.
Barðdal, Eythórsson 2020
J. Barðdal, Th. Eythórsson. How to identify cognates in syntax? Taking Watkins' legacy one step further. J. Barðdal, S. Gildea, E. Lujan (eds.) Reconstructing syntax. Leiden: Brill, 2020. P. 197–238.
Barðdal et al. 2012
J. Barðdal, Th. Smitherman, V. Bjarnadóttir, S. Danesi, G. B. Jenset, B. McGilliwray. Reconstructing constructional semantics: the dative subject construction in old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian. Studies in Language. 2012. Vol. 36. Iss. 3. P. 511–547.
Conti 1998
L. Conti. Zum Passiv von griechischen Verben mit Gen. bzw. Dat. als zweitem Komplement. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft. 1998. Vol. 58. P. 13–50.
Conti 2010
L. Conti. Análisis del dativo en construcciones impersonales: Los conceptos de sujeto y de semisujeto en griego antiguo. Emerita. 2010. Vol. 78. Iss. 2. P. 249–273.
Keenan 1976
E. Keenan. Towards a universal definition of 'subject'. Ch. Li (ed.). Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 1976. P. 303–333.
Luraghi 2020
S. Luraghi. Experiential verbs in Homeric Greek. A constructional approach. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
Viti 2016
C. Viti. Areal distribution of argument marking of Indo-European experience predicates. Journal of Indo-European Studies. 2016. Vol. 44. P. 1–84.
Viti 2017
C. Viti. Semantic and Cognitive Factors of Argument Marking in Ancient Indo-European Languages. Diachronica. 2017. Vol. 34. P. 368–419.
Keywords
experiential domain, constructions, non-canonical constructions, mental and emotional states
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus