ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

Grammatical representation of animacy in Modern Hebrew

DOI:10.30842/alp230657371721137
PDF, 965.52 kb
Belousov S. S. Grammaticheskoye vyrazheniye odushevlennosti v sovremennom ivrite. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2021. 17(2): 11–37.

Modern Hebrew is not generally considered a language with regular grammatical expression of the category of animacy. Usually, only question words or demonstrative pronouns are used to exemplify the animacy state of nouns. However, there is more data for it.

First, relative adjectives defining nationalities, membership and different qualities, have a variation in their inflextion paradigms. Adjectives have four basic forms in Hebrew, that is singular or plural and masculine or feminine. When used to describe people, a certain type of suffixes is used in the sg.f and pl.m forms (and these forms can easily be substantivated), whereas when speaking about inanimate nouns, the adjectives use other suffixes. Data from the Internet, which indirectly represents spoken language, especially orthography, reveals that sometimes the affixes used to describe people are used with ‘live’ objects on the whole, and beyond that. I claim that this phenomenon is a representation of the category of animacy in Modern Hebrew.

Secondly, there is a derivational nominal pattern CvC(C)áC famous for its inconstancy when speaking of plural construct state form: sometimes the vowel a is reduced, and sometimes not (this variation can not be explained by any undergoing phonetic process): the vowel a usually persists when the word is a profession name or a quality of a human being, but in case of inanimate objects it is typical to see reduction of the vowel. Here, I suggest that the phenomena represents grammatical humanness rather than animacy.

In the conclusion, an animacy scale, based on the material of the article, is made up. Not surprisingly it turns out to be quite the same as some famous typological animacy scales.

Keywords
animacy, Hebrew, relative adjectives
References
Academy 2010
Xaredim ve-xarediyim, xilonim ve-xiloniyim — siyomet -im le’umat siyomet -iyim [Xaredim ve-xarediyim, xilonim ve-xiloniyim — suffix -im vs. suffix -iyim]. Academy of Hebrew Language, 2010. Available at: https://hebrew-academy.org.il/2010/03/25/ חרדים-וחרדיים-חילונים-וחילוניים-סי / (accessed on 16.02.2021).
Academy 2011
Datit o datiya — -it leumat -iya [Datit or datiya — -it vs. -iya]. Academy of Hebrew Language, 2011. Available at: https://hebrew-academy.org.il/2011/07/07/ דתית-או-דתייה-סיומת-םִית-לעומת-סיומת / (accessed on 16.02.2021).
Academy 2013
Xaklay ve-xakla’i — al ha-siyomot -ay ve-a’i [Xaklay or xakla’i — about the suffixes -ay and -a’i] // Academy of Hebrew Language, 2011. URL: https://hebrew-academy.org.il/2013/06/18/ חקלַאי-וחקלָאִי-על-הסיומות-ַאי-ו-אִי / (accessed on 16.02.2021).
Aykhenvald 1990
A. Yu. Aykhenvald. Sovremennyy ivrit [Modern Hebrew]. Moscow: Nauka; Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury, 1990.
Barkali 2000
Sh. Barkali. Lúax ha-šemót ha-šalém [Complete table of nominals]. Jerusalem: Reuven Mas, 2000.
Becker 2014
M. Becker. The acquisition of syntactic structure animacy and thematic alignment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Bekins 2014
P. Bekins. Transitivity and object marking in Biblical Hebrew. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 2014.
Bliboim 1995
R. Bliboim. Taxbír+ [Syntax+]. Jerusalem: Academon, 1995.
Comrie 1989
B. Comrie. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Dahl 2008
Ö. Dahl. Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua. 2008. No. 118. P. 141–150.
Dahl, Fraurud 1996
Ö. Dahl, K. Fraurud. Animacy in grammar and discourse // Th. Fretheim, J.-K. Gundel (eds.). Reference and Referent Accessibility. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1996. P. 47–64.
Dreyer 2009
L. M. Dreyer. Sovremennyy ivrit [Modern Hebrew]. A. G. Belova, L. E. Kogan, S. V. Loesov, O. I. Romanova (eds.). Yazyki mira: Semitskiye yazyki. Akkadskiy yazyk. Severozapadnosemitskiye yazyki [Languages of the world: The Semitic languages. Akkadian. Northwest Semitic]. Moscow: Academia, 2009. P. 375–413.
Dekel 2014
N. Dekel. Colloquial Israeli Hebrew. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014.
Grande 1998
B. M. Grande. Vvedeniye v sravnitelnoye izucheniye semitskikh yazykov [Introduction to the comparative study of Semitic languages]. Moscow: Izdatelskaya firma “Vostochnaya literatura” RAN, 1998.
Gzella 2013
H. Gzella. Animacy. G. Khan (ed.). Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics. Vol. I. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2013. P. 109–110.
Haxlatot 2014
Haxlatót ha-akadémya ba-dikdúk [Academy rulings: Grammar]. Jerusalem: Academy of Hebrew language, 2014.
Kogan, Loesov 2009
L. E. Kogan, S. V. Loesov. Drevneyevreyskiy yazyk [Ancient Hebrew]. A. G. Belova, L. E. Kogan, S. V. Loesov, O. I. Romanova (eds.). Yazyki mira: Semitskiye yazyki. Akkadskiy yazyk. Severozapadnosemitskiye yazyki [Languages of the world: The Semitic languages. Akkadian. Northwest Semitic]. Moscow: Academia, 2009. P. 296–375.
Plungian 2011
V. A. Plungian. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira [Introduction to Grammatical semantics: Grammatical meaning and grammatical systems of the world’s languages]. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities Press, 2011.
Schwarzwald 2018
O. (R.) Schwarzwald. Stress assignment in words with -i suffix in Hebrew. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics. 2018. Vol. 15. No. 3. P. 110–127. Available at: http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL38/pdf_doc/06.pdf (accessed on 16.02.2021).
Silverstein 1976
M. Silverstein. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. R. M. W. Dixon (ed.). Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 1976. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. P. 112–171.
Yamamoto 2006
M. Yamamoto. Agency and impersonality: their linguistic and cultural manifestations. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.
Keywords
animacy, Hebrew, relative adjectives
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus