ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies
ISSN: 2306-5737E-ISSN: 2658-4069
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana
Transactions of the Institute for Linguistic Studies 

Bivalent predicates’ argument encoding in Neo-Aramaic varieties spoken in Urmiya, Krasnodar Krai

DOI:10.30842/alp2306573716224
PDF, 567.32 kb
Say S. S. Markirovaniye aktantov dvukhmestnykh predikatov v novoarameyskikh idiomakh sela Urmiya. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2020. XVI(2): 654–689.

The aim of this study is to identify valency classes in Northeastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA; < Semitic) varieties spoken in Urmiya, Krasnodar Krai. These varieties’ homelands are in the borderland of the present-day Iran, Turkey and Iraq. NENA speakers settled in Urmiya following several waves of migrations and multiple contacts with other languages (Iranic, Turkic, Russian, etc.).

This study is part of a broad typological project based on a questionnaire comprising 130 bivalent predicates. Language-particular valency classes are identified based on devices employed for encoding two predefined arguments.

In the NENA varieties of Urmiya, the main encoding devices are verb indexing for subjects and (direct) objects and prepositions employed for flagging oblique arguments.

Compared to other languages of Eurasia, including, e.g., Hebrew and Standard Arabic, the NENA varieties of Urmiya display a moderately-sized class of transitive verbs, which is typical of the languages of the Caucasus and Eastern Europe. This class covers a cross-linguistically predictable set of meanings, but displays an unusual pattern of differential object marking, which simultaneously includes optional object agreement and optional flagging by the dative-like preposition ka.

Individual intransitive classes are, by contrast, rather unpredictable in a typological perspective. Unusual features include a systematic ablative-comitative syncretism and idiosyncratic competition between mən and bi in source-like arguments and between ka and +al in goal-like arguments.

Finally, the NENA varieties display valency patterns with an extraposed noun phrase unindexed on the verb. These patterns reflect a transitory stage between discourse-motivated fronting and a nascent type of integrated argument structure.

There is both language-internal and cross-linguistic evidence to the effect that the valency class system in the NENA varieties of Urmiya is in a diachronically unstable state, which arguably reflects multiple contact situations and dialectal diversity.

Keywords
Neo-Aramaic languages, Semitic languages, argument structure, valency classes, transitivity, differential object marking, prepositions, verb indexing, language contacts, multidimensional scaling
References
Agassiyev 2007
S. A. Agassiyev. Grammatika sovremennogo assiriyskogo yazyka [A grammar of the modern Assyrian language]. St. Petersburg: The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Press, 2007.
Bossong 1991
G. Bossong. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. D. Wanner, D. A. Kibbee (eds.). New Analyses in Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XVIII, Urbana-Campaign, April 7–9, 1988. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1991. P. 143–170.
Coghill 2014
E. Coghill. Differential object marking in Neo-Aramaic. Linguistics. 2014. Vol. 52 (2). P. 335–364.
Comrie 1989
B. Comrie. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and morphology (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Dahl, Koptjevskaja-Tamm 2001
Ö. Dahl, M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm. Kinship in grammar. I. Baron, M. Herslund, F. Sørensen (eds.). Dimensions of Possession. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001. P. 201–225.
de Leeuw, Mair 2009
J. de Leeuw, P. Mair. Multidimensional scaling using majorization: SMACOF in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2009. Vol. 31(3). P. 1–30. Available at: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v31/i03/ (accessed on: 03.08.2020).
Dowty 1991
D. Dowty. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language. 1991. Vol. 67. P. 547–619.
Grossman, Witzlack-Makarevich 2019
E. Grossman, A. Witzlack-Makarevich. Valency and transitivity in contact: An overview. Journal of Language Contact. 2019. Vol. 12. P. 1–26.
Haig 2018
G. Haig. The grammaticalization of object pronouns: Why differential object indexing is an attractor state. Linguistics. 2018. Vol. 56 (4). P. 781–818.
Hopper, Thompson 1985
P. J. Hopper, S. A. Thompson. The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. J. Haiman (ed.). Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1985. P. 151–183.
Iemmolo 2011
G. Iemmolo. Towards a Typological Study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation. PhD thesis. Pavia: University of Pavia, 2011.
Jie, Liang 2018
J. Jie, M. Liang. An animacy hierarchy within inanimate nouns: English corpus evidence from a prototypical perspective. Lingua. 2018. Vol. 205. P. 71–89.
Khan 2008
G. Khan. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Barwar. Vol. I: Grammar. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2008.
Khan 2016a
G. Khan. 2016. Left dislocation in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus. 2016. Vol. 50. 91–110.
Khan 2016b
G. Khan. 2016. The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of the Assyrian Christians of Urmi. Vols. 1—4. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2016.
Lyavdanskiy 2009
A. K. Lyavdanskiy. Novoarameyskiye yazyki [Neo-Aramaic languages]. A. G. Belova, L. E. Kogan, S. V. Lezov, O. I. Romanova (eds.). Yazyki mira: Semitskiye yazyki. Akkadskiy yazyk. Severozapadnosemitskiye yazyki [Languages of the world. Akkadian language. Northwest Semitic languages]. Moscow: Academia, 2009. P. 660–693.
Maclean 1901
A. J. Maclean. A Dictionary of the Dialects of Vernacular Syriac. Oxford: Clarendon, 1901.
Malchukov 2006
A. Malchukov. Transitivity parameters and transitivity alternations: constraining co-variation. L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, P. de Swart (eds.). Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. P. 329–359.
Murre-van der Berg 1999
H. L. Murre-van der Berg. From a Spoken to a Written Language. The Introduction and Development of Literary Urmia Aramaic in the Nineteenth Century. Leiden: Nederlands instituut voor het nabije oosten, 1999.
Noonan, Mihas 2007
M. Noonan, E. Mihas. Areal dimensions in case syncretisms: ablatives and genitives. Paper presented at the seventh biennial meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Paris, 2007. Available at: http://crossasia-repository.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/view/themen/T15/2007.html (accessed on: 15.08.2020).
Ovsjannikova et al. in prep.
M. Ovsjannikova, E. Zabelina, K. Kozhanov. Non-Urmi North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic varieties in the village of Urmiya, Russia. In preparation.
R Core Team 2019
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on: 06.07.2020).
Reznikova et al. 2012
T. Reznikova, E. Rakhilina, A. Bonch-Osmolovskaya. Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics. 2012. Vol. 50 (3). P. 421–465.
Sarkisov 2017
I. V. Sarkisov. Differentsirovannoye markirovaniye obyekta v khristianskom urmiyskom dialekte novoarameyskogo yazyka [Differential object marking in the Christian Urmi dialect of the Neo-Aramaic language]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy. 2017. Vol. XIII. Pt. 3. P. 371–392.
Sarkisov 2018
I. V. Sarkisov. K voprosu ob ergativnosti v novoarameyskikh yazykakh [On the problem of ergativity in Neo-Aramaic languages]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy. Vol. XIV. Pt. 2. P. 380–399.
Sasse 1993
H. J. Sasse. Syntactic phenomena in the world’s languages I: categories and relations. J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, Th. Vennemann (eds.). Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1993. P. 646–686.
Say 2014
S. Say. Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Language Dynamics and Change. 2014. Vol. 4 (1). P. 116–166.
Say 2018
S. S. Say. Markirovaniye aktantov dvukhmestnykh predikatov: predvaritelnyye itogi tipologicheskogo issledovaniya [Bivalent predicates’ argument encoding: preliminary results of a typological study]. S. S. Say (ed.). Valentnostnyye klassy dvukhmestnykh predikatov v raznostrukturnykh yazykakh [Bivalent verb classes in structurally diverse languages]. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, 2018. P. 557–616.
Say (ed.) 2018
S. S. Say (ed.). Valentnostnyye klassy dvukhmestnykh predikatov v raznostrukturnykh yazykakh [Bivalent verb classes in structurally diverse languages]. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, 2018.
Say 2020
S. Say. Bivalent patterns in Assyrian Neo-Aramaic. In: Say, Sergey (ed.). BivalTyp: Typological database of bivalent verbs and their encoding frames. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, RAS, 2020. (Data first published on August 19, 2020). Available at: https://www.bivaltyp.info (accessed on: 21.09.2020).
Say (ed.) 2020
S. Say (ed.). BivalTyp: Typological database of bivalent verbs and their encoding frames. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, RAS, 2020. Available at: https://www.bivaltyp.info (accessed on: 21.09.2020).
Say et al. 2018
S. S. Say, D. V. Gerasimov, S. Yu. Dmitrenko, N. M. Zaika, V. S. Khrakovskiy. Valentnostnyye klassy dvukhmestnykh predikatov: tipologicheskaya anketa i instruktsiya issledovatelyu [Bivalent verb classes: a typological questionnaire and guidelines for researchers]. S. S. Say (ed.). Valentnostnyye klassy dvukhmestnykh predikatov v raznostrukturnykh yazykakh [Bivalent verb classes in structurally diverse languages]. St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies, 2018. P. 25–46.
Siewierska 1999
A. Siewierska. From anaphoric pronoun to grammatical agreement marker: Why objects don’t make it. Folia Linguistica. 1999. Vol. 33 (1/2). P. 225–251.
Stassen 2009
L. Stassen. Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Stassen 2013
L. Stassen. Predicative possession. M. S. Dryer, M. Haspelmath, (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2013. Available at: http://wals.info/chapter/117 (accessed on: 03.08.2020)
Tsereteli 1964
K. G. Tsereteli. Sovremennyy assiriyskiy yazyk [Modern Assyrian languages]. Moscow: Nauka, 1964.
Tsunoda 1981
T. Tsunoda. Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics. 1981. Vol. 19. P. 389–438.
Keywords
Neo-Aramaic languages, Semitic languages, argument structure, valency classes, transitivity, differential object marking, prepositions, verb indexing, language contacts, multidimensional scaling
ScopusSCImago Journal & Country RankE-Library.ruCrossRefCyberLeninkaVAKERIH Plus