Semantic field of falling in Russian sign language
DOI:10.30842/alp2306573716133
Kyuseva M. V. Semanticheskoye pole
padeniya v russkom zhestovom yazyke. Acta Linguistica
Petropolitana. 2020. XVI(1): 1037–1060.
This paper presents an analysis of the semantic field of falling in Russian Sign Language (RSL). In this domain, RSL makes use of a particular group of signs usually referred to as ‘classifier predicates’ [Zwitserlood 2012]. These signs are highly iconic and do not have correlates in spoken languages. Separate structural components of classifier predicates, i.e. the handshape, the hand orientation, the trajectory and the direction of movement etc., describe different aspects of falling. For example, the handshape determines the type of the trajector, and the direction of movement indicates the start versus end-point locations of the trajector. While some of these aspects are typically marked in both sign and spoken languages, others are unique for the languages of the visual modality. The paper gives a detailed description of the internal structure of the classifier predicates occurring in this semantic field and discusses the implications these data provide for the theory of lexical typology. In particular, we explain the differences in lexicalization strategies between RSL and the spoken languages by two conceptualization modes RSL uses in this domain, i.e. the cognitive and the (purely) visual conceptualization. While the former is guided by cognitive processes and, therefore, is shared by sign and spoken languages, the latter is unique for the languages of the visual modality; it is responsible for the aspects of lexicalization based exclusively on the visual characteristics of the object/situation.
Keywords
References
Yu. D. Apresyan. Dejksis v leksike i
grammatike i naivnaya model mira [Deixis in the vocabulary and
grammar, and the naive model of the world]. Semiotika i
Informatika. 1986. Iss. 28. P. 5–33.
B. Bergman, L. Wallin. A preliminary
analysis of visual mouth segments in Swedish Sign Language. P.
Boyes-Braem, R. Sutton-Spence (eds.). The Hands are the Head of
the Mouth. The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages.
Hamburg: Signum Verlag, 2001. P. 51–65.
S. I. Burkova. Uslovnye konstruktscii
v russkom zhestovom yazyke [Conditional constructions in Russian
sign language]. O. V. Fedorova (ed.). Russkiy zhestovyy yazyk:
Pervaya lingvisticheskaya konferentsiya [Russian Sign
Language: The first linguistic conference]. Moscow: Moscow State
University Press, 2012. P. 50–81.
S. I. Burkova, V. I. Kimmelman
(eds.). Vvedenie v lingvistiku zhestovyh yazykov: Russkiy zhestovyy
yazyk [Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics: Russian Sign
Language]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University
Press, 2019.
S. I. Burkova, O. A. Varinova. K
voprosu o territorialnom i socialnom varirovanii russkogo
zhestovogo yazyka [On the issue of territorial and social variation
of the Russian Sign Language].O. V. Fedorova (eds.). Russkiy
zhestovyy yazyk: Pervaya lingvisticheskaya konferentsiya
[Russian Sign Language: The first linguistic conference]. Moscow:
Moscow State University Press, 2012. P. 127–143.
O. Crasborn. Nonmanual Structures in
Sign Language. K. Brown (еd.). Encyclopedia of Language &
Linguistics . Vol. 8. Boston: Elsevier, 2006. P.
668–672.
C. de Vos. Kata Kolok Color Terms and
the Emergence of Lexical Signs in Rural Signing Communities.
The Senses and Society. 2011. Vol. 6. Iss. 1. P.
68–76.
O. S. Drozdenko. Principy razrabotki
bazy zhestov RZhYa so specificheskim rotovym komponentom.
[Principles of developing the base of gestures of Russian Sign
Language with a specific oral component. Bachelor thesis]. Moscow:
Moscow State University, 2018.
E. V. Filimonova.
Funkcionalno-semanticheskaya kategoriya aspektualnosti v russkom
zhestovom yazyke. Diss. … kand. filol. nauk [Functional-semantic
category of aspectuality in the Russian sign language. Phil. cand.
diss.]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University,
2015.
I. F. Geilman. Specificheskie
sredstva obshcheniya gluhih. Daktilologiya i mimika [Specific means
of communication between the deaf. Dactylology and facial
expressions]. Vol. 1—4. Leningrad: All-Russian Society of the Deaf,
1975.
L. Grenoble. An overview of Russian
sign language. Sign Language Studies. 1992. Vol. 77. P.
321–338.
T. Hanke. HamNoSys — Representing
sign language data in language resources and language processing
contexts. O. Streiter, C. Vettori (eds.). Workshop proceedings:
Representation and processing of sign languages. Paris: ELRA,
2004. P. 1–6.
A. Herrmann, M. Steinbach. (eds.).
Non-manuals in Sign Language. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John
Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013.
T. Johnston, A. Schembri. Australian
Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language
linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
T. Johnston, J. van Roekel, A.
Schembri. On the Conventionalization of Mouth Actions in Australian
Sign Language. Language and Speech. 2016. Vol. 59. Iss. 1.
P. 3–42.
E. A. Khristoforova. Inventar
semanticheskih klassifikatorov russkogo zhestovogo yazyka
[Inventory of semantic classifiers of the Russian sign language.
Bachelor thesis]. Moscow: National Research University Higher
School of Economics, 2017.
V. I. Kimmelman. Information
structure in Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the
Netherlands. PhD thesis. Amsterdam, NL: University of Amsterdam,
2014.
M. V. Kyuseva. Fizicheskie svoystva v
russkom zhestovom yazyke v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Diss. …
kand. filol. nauk [Physical properties in Russian Sign Language in
typological perspective. Phil. cand. diss.]. Moscow: Institute of
Linguistics, 2019.
S. K. Liddell. Grammar, Gesture, and
Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2003.
C. Padden, D. Brentari. A lexicon
with multiple origins: Native and foreign vocabulary in American
Sign Language. D. Brentari (ed.). Foreign Vocabulary in Sign
Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Word Formation.
Mahwah; NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. P. 87–119.
E. A. Pasalskaya. Rezultativnaya
konstruktsiya v russkom zhestovom yazyke [Resultative construction
in Russian Sign Language]. Term paper. Moscow: National Research
University Higher School of Economics, 2017.
R. Pfau, M. Steinbach. Pluralization
in sign and speech: Across-modal typological study. Linguistic
Typology. 2006. Vol. 10. Iss. 2. P. 135–182.
R. Pfau, M. Steinbach. Complex
sentences in sign languages: Modality, typology, discourse. R.
Pfau, M. Steinbach, A. Herrmann (eds.). A matter of complexity:
Subordination in sign languages. (Sign Languages and Deaf
Communities, 6). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2016. P.
1–35.
E. V. Prozorova. Markery lokalnoy
struktury diskursa v russkom zhestovom yazyke. Diss. … kand. filol.
nauk [Markers of the local structure of discourse in the Russian
Sign Language. Phil. cand. diss.]. Moscow: Moscow State University,
2009.
E. V. Rakhilina, T. I. Reznikova.
Frejmovyy podhod k leksicheskoy tipologii [A frame-based approach
to lexical typology]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya.
2013. No. 2. P. 3–31.
K. Sagara, U. Zeshan. Semantic fields
in sign languages - A comparative typological study. K. Sagara, U.
Zeshan (eds.). Semantic fields in sign languages: colour,
kinship and quantification. (Sign Language Typology, 6).
Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2016. P. 3–41.
A. Schembri, C. Jones, D. Burnham.
Comparing Action Gestures and Classifier Verbs of Motion: Evidence
from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and
Nonsigners’ Gestures Without Speech. Journal of Deaf Studies
and Deaf Education. 2005. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 272–290.
M. M. Tsfasman. Sintaksis imennoy
gruppy v russkom zhestovom yazyke [The syntax of the noun phrase in
the Russian Sign Language]. Term paper. Moscow: National Research
University Higher School of Economics, 2016.
A. S. Tsypenko. Genitivnaya
konstruktsiya v russkom zhestovom yazyke [Genitive construction in
the Russian Sign Language]. Term paper. Moscow: Moscow State
University, 2008.
E. Wilkinson. Typology of Signed
Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology. PhD thesis.
Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico, , 2009.
B. Woll. Do mouths sign? Do hands
speak?: Echo phonology as a window on language genesis. R. Botha,
H. de Swart (eds.). Language evolution: The view from
restricted linguistic systems. Utrecht: LOT Occasional Series,
2009. P. 203–224.
J. Woodward. All in the Family:
Kinship Lexicalization Across Sign Languages. Sign Language
Studies. 1978. No. 19. P. 121–138.
J. Woodward. Basic Color Term
Lexicalization Across Sign Languages. Sign Language
Studies. 1989. No. 63. P. 145–152.
G. L. Zaitseva. Metody izucheniya
sistemy zhestovogo obshcheniya gluhih. [Methods of studying the
system of sign communication between the deaf].
Defectology. 1987. No. 1. P. 3–11.
G L. Zaitseva. Zhestovaya rech.
Daktilologiya. Uchebnik dlya studentov vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy
[Gesture speech. Dactylology: A textbook for university students].
Moscow: VLADOS, 2000.
U. Zeshan. Interrogative
Constructions in Signed Languages: Crosslinguistic Perspectives.
Language. 2004. Vol. 80. No. 1. P. 7–39.
U. Zeshan, C. E. E. Delgado, H.
Dikyuva, S. Panda, C. de Vos. Cardinal numerals in rural sign
languages: Approaching cross-modal typology. Linguistic
Typology. 2013. Vol. 17. Iss. 3. P. 357–396.
I. Zwitserlood. Classifiers. R. Pfau,
M. Steinbach, B. Woll (eds.). Sign Language: An International
Handbook. Utrecht: LOT, 2002. P. 158–186.
