Lexical typology through learner corpora:
semantic domain of falling
DOI:10.30842/alp2306573716111
Vyrenkova A. S. Leksicheskaya tipologiya
v oshibkakh izuchayushchikh russkiy kak inostrannyy: analiz glagola
padat v tekstakh inofonov. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana.
2020. XVI(1): 368–388.
This paper investigates the use of the Russian verb
padat’ ‘to fall’ and its quasi-synonyms. Padat’
is dominant in the system of Russian predicates of falling — and
therefore should be suitable for describing any type of
uncontrolled downward motion. However, in a number of contexts a
different means of expression is required. These contexts are not
easily detected because they normally render the meanings which are
peripheral in the semantic domain of falling. In this study, we
attempt to find such contexts with the help of the Russian Learner
Corpus, which contains texts produced by heritage speakers and
learners of Russian with various dominant languages. The corpus
enables search by error tags and gives valuable data for the
analysis of learners’ interlanguage. Lexical and grammatical
violations found in the free production of foreign learners of
Russian are used to uncover cases where the dominant verb
padat’ ‘to fall’ yields to its quasi-synonymous
counterparts. In this paper we are aiming at detecting specific
limitations in the distribution of the dominant lexeme and, based
on the data coming from the Russian Learner Corpus (for this study
examples from learners dominant in English and Korean are taken),
we focus on the initial point of the falling motion, precipitation
subframe and aspectual characteristics of the dominant verb
upast’ and its quasi-synonym vypast’. The latter
issue is investigated through the scope effect that the verbs of
falling demonstrate in combination with the Russian proximative
adverb počti ‘almost’. For each case we
give a possible explanation of the learner’s error and make an
attempt to establish the rules of standard Russian that make the
use of the dominant lexeme unacceptable. The results of the study
significantly contribute to typological analysis of dominant
systems across languages and have implications for synchronic and
diachronic studies of domain lexemes.
Keywords
learner corpus, interference, lexical
typology, verbs of falling
References
Baranov et al. 1993
A. N. Baranov, V. A. Plungian, E. V.
Rakhilina. Putevoditel po diskursivnym slovam russkogo yazyka [A
Handbook of Discursive Words in the Russian Language]. Moscow:
Pomovsky i Partnery, 1993.
Bulygina 1982
T. V. Bulygina. K postroeniyu
tipologii predikatov v russkom yazyke [Towards a Typology of
Predicates in the Russian Language]. O. N. Seliverstova (ed.).
Semanticheskie tipy predikatov. [Semantic types of
predicates]. Moscow: Nauka, 1982. P. 7–85.
Bulygina 1983
T. V. Bulygina. Klassy predikatov i
aspektualnaya kharakteristika vyskazyvaniya. M.V. Lyapon, N.Yu.
Shvedova (eds.). Aspektualnye i temporalnye znacheniya v
slavyanskikh yazykakh [Classes of Predicates and Aspectual
Characteristics of Clauses. Aspectual and Temporal Meanings in
Slavic Languages]. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. P. 20–39.
Comrie 1985
B. Comrie. Tense. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Doke 1930
C. M. Doke. Textbook of Zulu grammar.
Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman, 1930.
Ellis 1994
R. Ellis. The study of second
language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Eriksen et al. 2012
P. Eriksen, S. Kittilä, L.
Kolehmainen. Weather and language. Language and Linguistics
Compass. 2012. Vol. 6. Iss. 6. P. 383–402.
Granger 2017
S. Granger. Learner Corpora in
Foreign Language Education. S. Thorne, S. May (eds.). Language,
Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and
Education (3rd ed.). Cham: Springer, 2017.
Heine 1994
B. Heine. On the genesis of aspect in
African languages: The proximative. Paper presented at the annual
meeting of Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley, 1994.
König 1993
C. König. Aspekt im Maa. [AMO,
Afrikanistische Monographien 3]. Köln: Universität zu Köln,
1993.
Kuteva 1998
T. Kuteva. On identifying an evasive
gram: action narrowly averted. Studies in
Language. 1998. Vol. 22. No 1. P. 113–160.
Kuteva 2009
T. Kuteva. Grammatical categories and
linguistic theory: elaborateness in grammar. P. K. Austin, O. Bond,
M. Charette, D. Nathan, P. Sells (eds.). Proceedings of
Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 2.
London: SOAS, 2009. Available at www.hrelp.org/eprints/ldlt2_03.pdf
(accessed on 08.10.2019).
Lado 1957
R. Lado. Linguistics across cultures:
Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan
Press: Ann Arbor, 1957.
Levin, Krejci 2019
B. Levin, B. Krejci. Talking about
the weather: Two construals of precipitation events in English.
Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 2019. Vol. 4.
Iss. 1.
Paducheva 1996
E. V. Paducheva. Semanticheskie
issledovaniya. Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika
narrativa [Studies in Semantics. Semantics of Tense and Aspect in
Russian. Semantics of Narrative]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy
kultury, 1996. 2nd Edition, 2010.
Pesetsky 1995
D. Pesetsky. Zero Syntax. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press, 1995.
Plungyan 2001
V. A. Plungyan. Antirezultativ: do i
posle rezultata. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. 1st
Edition: Glagolnye kategorii [Antiresultative: before and after the
result. Studies in Grammar Theory. Verbal categories]. Moscow:
Russkie slovari, 2001. P. 50–88.
Plungyan 2011
V. A. Plungyan. Vvedenie v
grammaticheskuyu semantiku [Introduction to Grammatical Semantics].
Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities Press,
2011.
Rizzi 1990
L. Rizzi. Relativized Minimality.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
Selinker 1972
L. Selinker. Interlanguage. IRAL
— International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching. 1972. Vol. 10. Iss. 3. P. 209–231.
Talmy 2000
L. Talmy. Toward a Cognitive
Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge MA: MIT Press,
2000.
Ziegeler 2000
D. Ziegeler. What almost can reveal
about counterfactual inferences. Journal of Pragmatics.
2000. Vol. 32. P. 1743–1776.
Ziegeler 2010
D. Ziegeler. Running the gauntlet on
the approximatives debate: A response to recent challenges.
Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 42. P. 681–704.
Keywords
learner corpus, interference, lexical
typology, verbs of falling