Lative in Hill Mari
DOI:10.30842/alp2306573714208
Davidyuk T. I. Lativ v gornomariyskom
yazyke. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 195.
There are three locative cases in Hill
Mari — inessive, illative, and lative. Inessive and illative encode
respectively location and direction, while lative can mark both
these situations, but with some restrictions to be considered in
this paper. In addition, unlike inessive and illative, lative has
many non-spatial meanings that may be related, in my view, to its
spatial meanings. Thus, in this paper I consider the spatial and
non-spatial uses of lative, as well as relations between these
uses.
Keywords
References
Iu. D. Apresian (ed.). Aktivnyi
slovar’ russkogo iazyka [Active Russian dictionary]. Vols. 1–2:
A–G. M.: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, 2014.
O. L. Biriuk, F. I. Rozhanskii.
Tretii lishnii (obstoiatel’stvennyi padezh v mariiskom iazyke)
[Third is a crowd (a circumstantial case in Mari)] // V. A.
Plungian (ed.). Issledovaniia po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 2.
Grammatikalizatsiia prostranstvennykh znachenii v iazykakh mira.
Moskva: OOO «Russkie slovari», 2002. P. 107–126.
I. S. Galkin. Istoricheskaia
grammatika mariiskogo iazyka. Morfologiia. [Historical grammar of
Mari. Morphology]. Part I. Ioshkar-Ola: Mariiskoe knizhnoe
izdatel’stvo, 1964.
D. S. Ganenkov. Modeli polisemii
prostranstvennykh pokazatelii [Polysemy models of spatial markers].
Diplomnaia rabota, MGU, M., 2002.
T. I. Davidiuk, L. S. Kozlov. Lativ v
gornomariiskom iazyke (tezisy, ustnyi doklad, materialy k dokladu)
[Lative in Hill Mari (abstract, oral presentation, materials for
the talk)]. In: Trinadtsataia Konferentsiia po tipologii i
grammatike dlia molodykh issledovatelei. Sankt-Peterburg, 2016.
(http://www.youngconfspb.com/application/files/2014/8035/6578/Davidyuk_Kozlov.pdf)
O. V. Zorina. Istoriia i sovremennoe
sostoianie padezhnoi sistemy gornomariiskogo iazyka [Historical and
modern case system of Hill Mari]. Dissertatsiia k. f. n., SPbGU,
SPb., 2002.
N. T. Pengitov. Sovremennyi mariiskii
iazyk. Morfologiia [Modern Mari. Morphology]. Ioshkar-Ola:
Mariiskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1961.
A. A. Savatkova. Gornoe narechie
mariiskogo iazyka [The Hill dialect of Mari] [Bibliotheca
Ceremissica 5]. Savariae: Berzsenyi Dániel Főiskola, 2002.
M. N. Stroeva. Semantika lokativnykh
padezhei v ural’skikh iazykakh [Semantics of locative cases in
Uralic languages]. Diplomnaia rabota, MGU, M., 2008.
A. Alhoniemi. Über die Function des
Wohin-Kasus im Tscheremissischen. [Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran
Toimituksia (n. 142)]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura,
1967.
A. Alhoniemi. Grammatik des
Tscheremissischen (Mari): mit Texten und Glossar (aus dem Finn.
übers. von Hans-Hermann Bartens). Hamburg: Buske, 1993.
C. Brugman, G. Lakoff. Cognitive
topology and lexical networks // G. Cottrell et al. (eds.). Lexical
ambiguity resolution: perspectives from psycholinguistics,
neuropsychology and artificial intelligence. San Mateo (CA): M.
Kaufman, 1988.
S. Kittilä, J. Ylikoski. Remarks on
the coding of Goal, Recipient and Vicinal Goal in the European
Uralic // S. Kittilä, K. Västi, J. Ylikoski (eds.).Case, Animacy
and Semantic Roles [Typological Studiesin Language, v. 99].
Amsterdam — Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011. P. 29–64.
C. Lehmann, Y.-M. Shin. The
Functional Domain of Concomitance. A Typological Study of
Instrumental and Comitative Relations // C. Lehmann (ed.).
Typological studies in participation [Studia Typologica 7]. Berlin:
Akademie Verlag, 2005. P. 9–104.
S. Luraghi. Plotting diachronic
semantic maps. The role of metaphor // S. Luraghi, H. Narrog
(eds.). Perspectives on Semantic Roles. Amsterdam — Philadelphia:
John Benjamins, 2014.
A. Malchukov, H. Narrog. Case
polysemy // A. Malchukov, A. Spencer (eds.). The Oxford handbook of
case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
H. Narrog. Varieties of Instrumental
// A. Malchukov, A. Spencer (eds.). The Oxford handbook of case.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
J. Ylikoski. A survey of the origins
of directional case suffixes in European Uralic // S. Kittilä, K.
Västi, J. Ylikoski (eds.). Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles
[Typological Studiesin Language 99]. Amsterdam — Philadelphia: John
Benjamins, 2011. P. 235–280.
