DOI:10.30842/alp230657372014897
Gordeyev N. O. Glagolnyye karitivnyye
konstruktsii norvezhskogo yazyka. Acta Linguistica
Petropolitana. 48–97.
The article proposes a detailed description of the verbal
caritive constructions in Norwegian and an analysis of their formal
and semantic features. The description proceeds from the semantic
core of caritive constructions to their periphery and up to the
very border of the Norwegian caritive zone. For the purposes of
this work, the caritive itself is understood broadly as a semantic
category conveying the meaning of loss/absence of either an
anticipated participant in a situation or of an item in possession
by the situation’s main participant.
The caritive markers for this analysis were selected based on
both semantic and formal criteria; they are understood here as
semantically grouped constructions representing different
linguistic levels. The term construction is interpreted here in a
sense close to that of the Construction Grammar, i.e. as a
partially idiomatic form-meaning pairing.
The paper divides the Norwegian caritive zone into two major
subzones — that of loss and that of concession. The latter
demonstrates somewhat stronger semantic complexity where the core
elements of respective caritive situations, i.e. the loss/absence
of an anticipated item, are additionally treated as a successfully
negotiated impediment. Though quite different, the components
included into each of the two subzones can contain the most basic
caritive marker in Norwegian, the preposition uten
‘without’. Notably, Norwegian constructions expressing concession
also can convey the idea of avoidance thus expanding into (and
across) the farthest periphery of the caritive zone where the very
absence of an unwanted situation is understood as anticipated and
achieved. Given that the semantics of avoidance also can be
expressed with the help of the abovementioned preposition
uten ‘without’, this subsidiary zone is analyzed in the
paper as well.
Keywords
caritive, caritive construction, construction
grammar, Norwegian
References
Goldberg 1995
A. E. Goldberg. Constructions: A
Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago,
IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Gries, Stefanowitsch 2004a
S. Th. Gries, A. Stefanowitsch.
Extending collostructional analysis: a corpus-based perspective on
‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics. 2004. Vol. 9. Iss. 1. Р. 97–129. DOI:
10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri.
Gries, Stefanowitsch 2004b
S. Th. Gries, A. Stefanowitsch.
Co-varying collexemes in the intocausative. M. Achard, S. Kemmer
(eds.). Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI,
2004. Р. 225–236. DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri.
Khristosova 2021
K. A. Khristosova. Formirovanie
semi konstruktsiy na primere karitivov [Establishment of a
construction family: the case of caritive]. Available at:
https://www.hse.ru/ma/foreign/students/diplomas/474833536 (accessed
on 18.03.2024).
Oskolskaya et al. 2020
S. А. Oskolskaya, N. М. Zaika, S. B.
Klimenko, М. L. Fedotov. Opredelenie karitiva kak sravnitelnogo
ponyatiya [Defining caritive as a comparative concept]. Voprosy
Jazykoznanija. 2020. No. 3. Р. 7–25. DOI:
10.31857/S0373658X0009370-6.
Plungyan 2010
V. А. Plungyan. Obshhaya
morfologiya: Vvedenie v problematiku [General morphology:
introduction to the problematique]. Moscow: Publishing House
“Librokom”, 2010.
Stefanowitsch, Gries 2003
A. Stefanowitsch, S. Th. Gries.
Collostructions: investigating the interaction between words and
constructions. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics. 2003. Vol. 8. Iss. 2. Р. 209–243. DOI:
10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste.
Stefanowitsch, Gries 2005
A. Stefanowitsch, S. Th. Gries.
Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic
Theory. 2005. Vol. 1. Iss. 1. Р. 1–43. DOI: 10.1515/cllt.2005.
1.1.1.
Stolz et al. 2007
T. Stolz, C. Stroh, A. Urdze.
With(out): On the markedness relation between
comita-tives/instrumentals and abessives. WORD: Journal of the
International Linguistic Association. 2007. Vol. 58. Iss. 1–3.
Р. 63–122. DOI: 10.1080/00437956.2007.11432575.