On new reconstructions of PIE “laryngeals”, especially as uvular stops
DOI:10.30842/alp23065737181199215
Kümmel Martin Joachim. On new
reconstructions of PIE “laryngeals”, especially as uvular stops.
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2022. 18(1):
199–215.
More than hundred years after the partial confirmation of the laryngeal theory by the Hittite evidence this aspect of the phonological reconstruction of Proto-Indo-European has remained one of the most controversial ones. While there is widespread agreement about the reconstruction of three “laryngeals”, their phonological interpretation is less clear. Recently, two radically different new interpretations have been proposed: 1) a reconstruction of just one “glottal fricative” (corresponding to *h₂) by Pyysalo [2013] with sharp critique of most assumptions of the received theory, and 2) a reinterpretation of *h₂ and *h₃ as uvular stops by Kloekhorst [2018], mainly based on their continuation as velar stops in Lycian and Carian. While the former proposal suffers from severe methodological weaknesses and is therefore not further discussed here, the latter seems more promising, as it is based on the usual methodology of comparative reconstruction applied to the actual evidence of Anatolian. After reviewing the most crucial general evidence for the reconstruction of “laryngeals”, especially cases of preserved consonants (including hitherto rarely considered evidence from Iranic), the arguments for uvular stops are discussed. Some problematic phonetic details of Kloekhorst's proposal are criticized, with the result that a reinterpretation according to this critique may even strengthen the general idea of uvular stops. Especially the assumption of *h₃ being a labialized fortis is rejected, instead it is argued that the evidence points to a non-labialized lenis obstruent, thus introducing a distinction typical for stops within the IE system. At the end, remaining problems are discussed, and an alternative scenario for the Anatolian development is mentioned (though not extensively discussed). The conclusion is that uvular stops might indeed be the original value of PIE *h₂ and *h₃ but they might have become uvular fricatives already in PIE, or in late Proto-Anatolian, and the stop reflexes of younger Anatolian languages could also be secondary, independent of the original status of the PIE sounds.
Keywords
References
I.-J. Adiego. The Carian language.
Leiden: Brill, 2007.
R. S. P. Beekes. The nature of the
Proto-Indo-European laryngeals. Th. Vennemann (ed.). The new sound
of Indo-European. Essays in phonological reconstruction.
Proceedings of a workshop held during the Seventieth International
Conference on Historical Lin-guistics held Sept. 9–13, 1985 at the
University of Pavia. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1989. P.
23–33.
R. S. P. Beekes. Who were the
laryngeals. J. E. Rasmussen (ed.). In honorem Holger Pedersen.
Kolloquium der indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 25. bis 28. März
1993. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1994. P. 449–454.
Ch. Bozzone. Ini-tial “Yod” in Greek
and the Etymology of Gk. ἵππος 'horse'. S. W. Jamison, H. C.
Melchert, B. Vine (eds.). Proceedings of the 24th Annual UCLA
Indo-European Conference. Bremen: Hempen, 2013. P. 1–26.
P. Cohen, A. Hyllested. A new sound
law of PIE: Initial **h₃w > *h₂w. B. N. Whitehead, Th. Olander,
B. A. Olsen, J. E. Rasmussen (eds.). The Sound of Indo-European.
Pho-netics, Phonemics and Morphophonemics. Selected papers from the
conference held in Copenhagen, 16–19 April 2009. Copenhagen: Museum
Tusculanum, 2012. P. 53–72.
H. Eichner. Ana-tolisch und
Trilaryngalismus. A. Bammesberger (Hrsg.). Die Laryngaltheorie und
die Rekonstruktion des indogermanischen Laut- und Formensystems.
Heidelberg: Winter, 1988. P. 123–151.
J. Gippert. Zur Phonetik der
Laryngale. J. E. Rasmussen (ed.). In honorem Holger Pedersen.
Kol-loquium der indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 25. bis 28. März
1993. Wiesba-den: Reichert, 1994. P. 455–466.
H. Hendriksen. Untersuchungen über
die Bedeutung des Hethitischen für die Laryngaltheorie. Copenhagen:
Munksgaard, 1941.
S. Holopainen. Indo-Iranian
borrowings in Uralic: Critical overview of sound substitutions and
distribution criterion. PhD Dissertation. Dissertation. Helsinki:
University of Helsinki, 2019. Available at:
http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-5729-4 (ac-cessed on:
18.05.2022).
M. Janda. Eleusis, das
indogermanische Erbe der Mysterien. Innsbruck: Institut für
Sprachwissen-schaft der Universität Innsbruck, 2000.
H. Katz. Studien zu den älteren
indoiranischen Lehnwörtern in den uralischen Sprachen. Heidel-berg:
Winter, 2003.
S. E. Kimball. *H₃ in Anatolian. In:
G. Cardona, N. H. Zide (eds.). Festschrift for Henry Hoenigswald.
On the occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. Tübingen: Narr, 1987.
P. 185–192.
A. Kloekhorst. Initial Laryngeals in
Anatolian. Historische Sprachforschung. 2006. Vol. 119. P.
77–108.
A. Kloekhorst. The language of Troy.
J. Kelder, G. Uslu, Ö. F. Şerifoğlu (eds.). Troy. City, Homer,
Turkey. Amsterdam: W Books, 2012. P. 46–50.
A. Kloekhorst. The Anatolian stop
system and the Indo-Hittite hypothesis. Indogermanische
Forschungen. 2016. Vol. 121. P. 213–247.
A. Kloekhorst. Anatolian evidence
suggests that the Indo-European laryngeals *h₂ and *h₃ were uvular
stops. Indo-European Linguistics. 2018. Vol. 6. P. 69–94.
J. Koivulehto. Uralische Evidenz für
die Laryngaltheorie. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der
Wissenschaften, 1991.
J. Koivulehto. Zum frühen iranischen
und indoiranischen lexikalischen Einfluss auf das
Fin-nisch-Ugrische. K. Karttunen, P. Koskikallio (eds.). Vidyā rṇ
avavandanam: es-says in honour of Asko Parpola. Helsinki: Finnish
Oriental Society, 2001. P. 359–378.
J. Koivulehto. The earliest contacts
between Indo-European and Uralic speakers in the light of lexical
loans. Ch. Carpelan, A. Parpola, P. Koskikallio (eds.). Early
Contacts between Uralic and Indo-European, Linguistic and
Archaeological Considerations. Papers presented at an international
symposium held at the Tvärminne Research Station of the University
of Helsinki, 8–10 January 1999. Helsinki: Suoma-lais-Ugrilainen
Seura, 2001. P. 235–263.
F. H. H. Kortlandt. The Tocharian
verbal endings. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies. 2014. Vol. 15.
P. 79–86.
M. J. Kümmel. Konsonantenwandel.
Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen
für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden: Reichert,
2007.
M. J. Kümmel. Typology and
reconstruction: The consonants and vowels of Pro-to-Indo-European.
B. N. Whitehead, Th. Olander, B. A. Olsen, J. E. Rasmussen (eds.).
The Sound of Indo-European. Phonetics, Phonemics and
Morphophone-mics. Selected papers from the conference held in
Copenhagen, 16–19 April 2009. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 2012.
P. 291–329.
M. J. Kümmel. Is ancient old and
modern new? Fallacies of attestation and reconstruction (with
special focus on Indo-Iranian). D. M. Goldstein, S. W. Jamison, B.
Vine (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Annual UCLA Indo-European
Conference, Los Angeles, October 23rd and 24th, 2015. Bremen:
Hempen, 2016. P. 79–96.
M. J. Kümmel. The survival of
laryngeals in Iranian. L. van Beek, A. Kloekhorst, G. Kroonen, M.
Peyrot, T. Pronk (eds.). Farnah. Indo-Iranian and Indo-European
studies in honor of Sasha Lubotsky. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave, 2018.
P. 162–172.
M. J. Kümmel. Thoughts about
Pre-Indo-European stop systems. A. Kloekhorst, T. Pronk (eds.). The
precursors of Proto-Indo-European: The Indo-Anatolian and
Indo-Uralic hy-potheses. Leiden; Boston: Brill; Rodopi, 2019. P.
115–130.
M. J. Kümmel. Substrata of
Indo-Iranic and related questions. R. Garnier (ed.). Loanwords and
substrata : proceedings of the colloquium held in Limoges (5th–7th
June, 2018). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der
Universität Innsbruck, 2020. P. 237–277.
M. J. Kümmel. Renaissance des
Monolaryngalismus? Über Rekonstruktionsmethoden. B. Brog-yanyi, R.
Lipp (eds.). Historische Linguistik II. Beiträge der Sektion
„Historische Linguistik“ der 26. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für
Sprache und Sprachen (Ge-SuS) e. V. „Traditionen und Erneuerungen“,
5.–8. April 2018, Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier. Hamburg: Dr.
Kovač.
N. N. Kazansky. The evidence for
Lycian in the Linear A syllabary. Donum natalicium digitaliter
confectum Gregorio Nagy septuagenario a discipulis collegis
familiaribus oblatum (A virtual birthday gift presented to Gregory
Nagy on turning seventy by his stu-dents, colleagues, and friends),
2012. Available at:
https://www.academia.edu/41092710/The_Evidence_for_Lycian_in_the_Linear_A_Syllabary
(accessed on 18.05.2022).
J. Kuryłowicz. Ə indo-européen et
hittite. Symbolae Grammaticae in Honorem Ioannis Rozwadowski I.
Krakau: Drukarnia Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 1927. P.
95–104.
J. P. Mallory, D. Q. Adams (eds.).
Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. London; Chicago: Fitz-roy
Dearburn, 1997.
J. P. Mallory, D. Q. Adams. The
Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the
Pro-to-Indo-European world. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006,
2006.
H. C. Melchert. Reflexes of *h₃ in
Anatolian. Die Sprache. 1987. Vol. 33. P. 19–28.
H. C. Melchert. Anatolian historical
phonology. Amsterdam; Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994.
H. C. Melchert. Second thoughts on
PIE *y and *h₂ in Lydian. M. Mazoyer, O. Casabonne (eds.). Studia
Anatolica et Varia. Mélanges offerts à Professeur René Lebrun. Vol.
2. Pa-ris: L'Harmattan, 2004. P. 139–150.
H. C. Melchert. The
Proto-Indo-European verb for 'to pour' and medial *h₃ in Anatolian.
S. W. Jamison, H. C. Melchert, B. Vine (eds.). Proceedings of the
22nd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Bremen: Hempen, 2011. P.
127–132.
H. Møller. Semi-tisch und
Indogermanisch I (Konsonanten). Copenhagen: Hagerup, 1906.
H. Møller. Ver-gleichendes
indogermanisch-semitisches Wörterbuch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &
Ruprecht, 1911.
H. Møller. Die
semitisch-vorindogermanischen laryngalen Konsonanten. Copenhagen:
Høst, 1917.
R. Normier. Idg. Konsonantismus,
germ. „Lautverschiebung“ und Vernersches Gesetz. Zeitschrift für
vergleichende Sprachforschung. 1977. Vol. 91. P. 171–218.
Th. Olander. In-do-European cladistic
nomenclature. Indogermanische Forschungen. 2019. Vol. 124. P.
231–244.
J. Pokorny. Indo-germanisches
etymologisches Wörterbuch. Vol. 1. Bern; München: Francke,
1959.
J. Pyysalo. System PIE. The primary
phoneme inventory and sound law system for Pro-to-Indo-European.
Helsinki: UnigrafiaOy, 2013. Available at:
http://ethesis.helsinki.fi (accessed on 18.05.2022).
J. Pyysalo, J. Janhunen.
Indo-European Linguistics in the 21st century (1): From
trilaryngeal-ism to monolaryngealism: returning to Oswald
Szemerényi. Proto-Indo-European Linguistics — Urindogermanische
Sprachforschungen. 2018. Vol. 1. P. 1–5.
J. Pyysalo, J. Janhunen.
Indo-European Linguistics in the 21st century (2): On Frederik
Kort-landt's distributional trilaryngealistic model.
Proto-Indo-European Linguistics — Urindogermanische
Sprachforschungen. 2018. Vol. 2. P. 1–14.
J. Pyysalo, J. Janhunen.
Indo-European Linguistics in the 21st century (3): Optimizing the
lar-yngeal theory: Testing the models of Puhvel, Eichner and
Melchert/Rix against Szemerényi's monolaryngealism.
Proto-Indo-European Linguistics — Urindo-germanische
Sprachforschungen. 2019. Vol. 1. P. 1–16.
J. E. Rasmussen. Determining
proto-phonetics by circumstantial evidence: the case of the
In-do-European laryngeals. F. Karlsson (ed.). Papers from the
Seventh Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Vol. 2. Helsinki:
University of Helsinki, Department of General Linguistics, 1983. P.
371–384.
J. E. Rasmussen. Initial h₃ in
Anatolian: A vote for chaos. Copenhagen Working Papers in
Linguis-tics. 1992. Vol. 2. P. 53–61.
J. E. Rasmussen. On the phonetics of
the IE laryngeals. J. E. Rasmussen (ed.). In honorem Holger
Pedersen. Kolloquium der indogermanischen Gesellschaft vom 25. bis
28. März 1993. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1994. P. 433–447.
J. E. Rasmussen. Selected papers on
Indo-European Linguistics. With a Section on Comparative Eskimo
Linguistics. 2 vols. Kopenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press,
1999.
D. Ringe. On the chronology of sound
changes in Tocharian. Vol. 1. From Proto-Indo-European to
Proto-Tocharian. New Haven: American Oriental Society, 1996.
H. Rix. Schrift und Sprache. M.
Cristofani (ed.). Die Etrusker. Stuttgart; Zürich: Belser,
1985.
H. Rix. Etruscan. R. D. Woodard
(ed.). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World's Ancient
Lan-guages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. P.
943–966.
F. de Saussure. Mémoire sur le
système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes.
Leipzig: Teubner, 1879.
F. de Saussure. Recueil des
publications scientifiques de Ferdinand de Saussure. Lausanne;
Genève: Payot, 1922.
D. Steinbauer. Neues Handbuch des
Etruskischen. St. Katharinen: Scripta Mercaturae, 1999.
E. Tichy. Indo-germanistisches
Grundwissen für Studierende sprachwissenschaftlicher Diszip-linen.
2., überarb. Aufl. Bremen: Hempen, 2004.
R. E. Wallace. Zikh Rasna: A manual
of the Etruscan language and inscriptions. Ann Arbor: Be-ech Stave
Press, 2008.
M. Weiss. Life everlasting, Latin
iūgis “everflowing“, Greek ὑγιής “healthy“, Gothic ajukdūþs
“eternity”, and Avestan yauuaēǰī- “living forever”. Münchener
Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft. 1995. Vol. 55. P. 131–156.
M. Weiss. The Proto-Indo-European
laryngeals and the name of Cilicia in the Iron Age. A. M. Byrd, J.
DeLisi, M. Wenthe (eds.). Tavet tat satyam. Studies in honor of
Jared S. Klein on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Ann
Arbor: Beech Stave Press, 2016. P. 331–339.
A. Yates. The phonology, phonetics,
and diachrony of Sturtevant's Law. Indo-European Lin-guistics.
2019. Vol. 7. P. 241–307.
