Nichols J. The Balkan sprachbund in typological-geographical space.
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2020. XVI(2): 306–330DOI: 10.30842/alp2306573716211
The Balkan sprachbund is known to its specialists as distinctive and made up of languages that are closely similar, a view that can best be assessed by typological comparison. This paper compares three different western Eurasian sprachbunds — Balkan, Circum-Baltic, and the Avar sphere in the Caucasus — to each other and to the larger sets of western Eurasia, all of northern Eurasia, and all of the northern hemisphere. The typological properties compared are six complex typological macrofeatures each consisting of a set of related features. They capture some of the classic Balkan features and some deep-seated typological traits, and they enable us to place the Balkan area in the larger typological and linguistic-geographical map of Eurasia. Mapped in typological space, the Balkan languages prove to be discrete as a set and to form a compact cluster at or even beyond the edge of the European typological space. That is, the Balkan sprachbund occupies an apex position, hyper-European or even ultra-European, in a typological map of Eurasia. In these respects it differs from the Circum-Baltic area and in some respects resembles the Avar sphere, which is also very compact and often peripheral or extreme in the Caucasus. The Balkan-Avar similarities and differences can be accounted for by similarities and differences in the sociolinguistics of the two areas. The main general conclusion is that the Balkan sprachbund is essential to understanding the linguistic geography and typology of all of Europe. Issues for future research are testing the robustness of the hyper-European characterization by surveying more features, and determining whether the Balkan sprachbund is leading the evolution of a European linguistic profile or is a zone of peripheral archaisms in an evolutionary process trending in the opposite direction.
Authors:
Nichols J.
johanna@berkeley.edu
J. Nichols
References:
B. Bickel, J. Nichols. Inflectional synthesis of the verb. M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, B. Comrie, D. Gil (eds.). World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2013. Available at: http://wals.info/chapter/22 (accessed Feb. 7, 2020).
Ö. Dahl, M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.). Circum-Baltic languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2001.
R. Derksen. Etymological dictionary of the Slavic inherited lexicon. Brill: Leiden, 2008.
N. Dobrushina. How to study multilingualism of the past: Investigating traditional contact situations in Daghestan. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2013. Vol. 17. Iss. 3. P. 376–393.
N. Dobrushina, M. Daniel, Y. Koryakov. Languages and sociolinguistics of the Caucasus. M. Polinsky (ed.). Oxford handbook of languages of the Caucasus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 163–192.
W. A. Foley. Structural and semantic dependencies in word class membership. N. Enfield (ed.). Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistic systems. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2017. P. 179–195.
V. A. Friedman. The Balkan languages and Balkan linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2011. Vol. 40. P. 275–291.
R. Grünthal, J. Nichols. Transitivizing/detransitivizing typology and language family history. Lingua Posnaniensis. 2018. Vol. 58. Iss. 2. P. 11–31.
M. Haspelmath. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. B. Comrie, M. Polinsky (eds.). Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993. P. 87–120.
B. Joseph. Language contact in the Balkans. R. Hickey (ed.). The handbook of language contact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. P. 618–633.
B. Kortmann. Adverbial subordination: A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997.
J. Lindstedt. Linguistic Balkanization: Contact-induced change by mutual reinforcement. D. G. Gilbers, J. Nerbonne, J. Schaeken (eds.). Languages in contact. Amsterdam; Atlanta: Rodopi, 2000. P. 231–246.
J. Lindstedt. Diachronic regularities explaining the tendency toward explicit analytic marking in Balkan syntax. B. Joseph, I. Krapova (eds.). Balkan syntax and (universal) principles of grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2019. P. 70–84.
J. Lindstedt, E. Salmela. Migrations and language shifts as components of the Slavic spread. T. Klír and V. Boček (eds.). Language contact and the early Slavs. Heidelberg: Winter, in press.
V. P. Nedyalkov. Nekotorye veroyatnostnye universalii v glagolnom slovoobrazovanii [Some probabilistic universals in verbal word formation]. F. Vardul (ed.). Yazykovye universalii i lingvisticheskaya tipologiya [Language universals and linguistic typology]. Moscow: Nauka, 1969. P. 106–114.
J. Nichols. Ingush transitivization and detransitivization. BLS. 1982. Vol. 8. P. 445–462.
J. Nichols. Linguistic complexity: A comprehensive definition and survey. G. Sampson, D. Gil, and P. Trudgill (eds.). Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. P. 110–125.
J. Nichols. Verb-based and noun-based languages. Presented at SLE 49, Leiden, 2016.
J. Nichols. Realization of the causative alternation: Revised wordlist and examples. Manuscript. 2017. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/ 28861776/Causative_alternation_wordlist (accessed Feb. 7, 2020).
J. Nichols. Person as an inflectional category. Linguistic Typology. 2017. Vol. 21. Iss. 3. P. 387–456.
J. Nichols. Non-linguistic conditions for causativization as a linguistic attractor. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018. Vol. 8. P. 23–56.
J. Nichols. Why is gender so complex? New typological considerations. F. Di Garbo and B. Wälchli (eds.). Grammatical gender and linguistic complexity. Berlin: Language Sciences Press, 2019. P. 63–92.
J. Nichols. Canonical complexity. P. Arkadiev and F. Gardani (eds.). The complexities of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 27–66.
J. Nichols, D. A. Peterson, and J. Barnes. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology. 2004. Vol. 8. Iss. 2. P. 149–211.
I. A. Seržant. The Circum-Baltic area. J. Fellerer and N. Bermel (eds.). The Slavonic languages. (Oxford guides to the world’s languages). Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.
K. Shagal, M. Wahlström, J. Nichols. (Non)finiteness in clause combining: A typological survey. Presented at 13th Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, University of Pavia. 2019.
A. Siewierska. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
A. Siewierska. Person marking. J. J. Song (ed.). Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. P. 322–345.
M. Vasmer [M. Fasmer]. Etimologičeskiy slovar russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of Russian]. Translated and annotated by O. N. Trubačev. Vol. 3. Reprint. Moscow: Progress, 1987. (First published in 1971).
Issue
XVI (2020) 2
Документ