Yakubovich Ilya͏. Morphophonemic variation in Luwian clitic chains and the origin of the particle [꞊r].
Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2022. 18(1): 485–502DOI: 10.30842/alp23065737181485502
The Luwian language was spoken in Ancient Anatolia and is attested through written texts that are approximately datable to 1500–800 BCE. It belongs to the Anatolian sub-family of the Indo-European family and thus represents a close relative of Hittite. The Luwian language is attested in cuneiform and hieroglyphic scripts, but the present paper is based on the data in cuneiform transmission, which reflects better the Luwian phonological system. As typical of the Anatolian languages, Luwian features the second-position Wackernagel clitics, which are arranged vis-à-vis each other according to their formal ranks but can undergo morphophonemic changes in sandhi with each other. Establishing the correct inventory of the Luwian clitics is impossible without studying the licensing conditions and outcomes of such processes. The present paper approaches this problem from the perspective of morphophonemic variation in parallel versions of Luwian cuneiform incantations.
One of the outcomes of the conducted analysis is the demonstration that the cuneiform sequences a-ta-tar and a-at-tar can reflect the same clitic chain /a꞊ada꞊dar/ at the morphophonemic level. This alternation provides a new argument toward vindicating the existence of the fortis/lenis opposition in the Luwian phonological system, which is superimposed upon the inherited opposition between voiced and voiceless plosives. Another result of this paper is the observation that the particles [꞊dar] and [꞊r], previously regarded as independent lexical units, represent allomorphs of the same clitic. The occurrences of [꞊r] are limited to the position after the pronominal clitics /꞊du/, /꞊mu/, and /꞊di/, while the variant [꞊dar] occurs after the pronominal clitics /꞊as/, /꞊an/, and /꞊ada/. A formal account involving “weak” and “strong” clitics is put forward to capture this distribution, but its ultimate rationale must have to do with the laws governing syncope and lenition in Luwian. Quite aside from its linguistic conclusions, the present paper sheds light on a number of obscure and mostly fragmentary Luwian passages, which have defied satisfactory account thus far.
One of the outcomes of the conducted analysis is the demonstration that the cuneiform sequences a-ta-tar and a-at-tar can reflect the same clitic chain /a꞊ada꞊dar/ at the morphophonemic level. This alternation provides a new argument toward vindicating the existence of the fortis/lenis opposition in the Luwian phonological system, which is superimposed upon the inherited opposition between voiced and voiceless plosives. Another result of this paper is the observation that the particles [꞊dar] and [꞊r], previously regarded as independent lexical units, represent allomorphs of the same clitic. The occurrences of [꞊r] are limited to the position after the pronominal clitics /꞊du/, /꞊mu/, and /꞊di/, while the variant [꞊dar] occurs after the pronominal clitics /꞊as/, /꞊an/, and /꞊ada/. A formal account involving “weak” and “strong” clitics is put forward to capture this distribution, but its ultimate rationale must have to do with the laws governing syncope and lenition in Luwian. Quite aside from its linguistic conclusions, the present paper sheds light on a number of obscure and mostly fragmentary Luwian passages, which have defied satisfactory account thus far.
Authors:
Yakubovich Ilya͏
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia)
sogdiana783@gmail.com
Ilya͏ Yakubovich
References:
J. Blevins. Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
A. Garrett, L. Kurke. Pudenda Asiae Minoris. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 1994. Vol. 96. P. 75–83.
F. Giusfredi. The Cuneiform Luwian Local Particles and the Obscure Particle -(V)r. P. Taracha, M. Kapełuś (eds.). Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Hittitology (Warsaw, 5–9 September 2011). Warsaw: Agade, 2014. P. 308–316.
P. Goedegebuure. The Luwian adverbs zanda “down” and *ānni “with, for, against”. A. Süel (ed.). Acts of the VIIth International Congress of Hittitology (Çorum, August 25–31, 2008). Ankara: Anıt, 2010. P. 299–318.
J. D. Hawkins. Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Vol. I. Pt. I, II: Texts. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 2000.
J. M. Jiménez Delgado. The Particle ἄρα from the 2nd to the 1st Millennium. M.-L. Nosch, H. L. Enegren (eds.). Aegean Scripts: Proceedings of the 14th International Colloquium on Mycenaean Studies (Copenhagen, 2–5 September 2015). Incunabula Graeca CV, 1. Roma: Edizioni Consiglio nazionale delle ricerche, 2017. P. 537–547.
J. Katz. The epic adventures of an unknown particle. C. George, M. McCullagh, B. Nielsen, A. Ruppel (eds.). Greek and Latin from an Indo-European Perspective. (Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Volume 32). Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 2017. P. 65–79.
H. Craig Melchert. Luvian Lexical Notes. Historische Sprachforschung. 1988. Vol. 101. P. 211–243.
H. Craig Melchert. Cuneiform Luvian Lexicon. Chapel Hill: Self-published, 1993.
H. Craig Melchert. A Dictionary of the Lycian Language. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave, 2004.
H. Craig Melchert. Enclitic subject pronouns in Hieroglyphic Luvian. Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies (Aramazd). 2011. Vol. 6. Pt. 2. P. 73–86.
H. Craig Melchert. New Luwian Verb Etymologies. H. Marquardt, S. Reichmuth, J.-V. García Trabazo (eds.). Anatolica et Indogermanica. Studia linguistica in honorem Johannes Tischler septuagenarii dedicata. (Innsbrucker Beträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 155). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck, 2016. P. 203–212.
E. Rieken. Die Zeichen <ta>, <tá> und <tà> in den hieroglyphen- luwischen Inschriften der Nachgroßreichszeit. A. Archi, R. Francia (eds.). VI Congresso Internazionale di Ittitologia (Roma, 5–9 settembre 2005). Pt. 2. P. 637–649 (= Studi Micenei et Anatolici. 2008. Vol. 50. P. 637–649).
E. Rieken. Word-internal plene spelling with <i> and <e> in Cuneiform Luwian Texts. Journal of Language Relationship. 2017. Vol. 15. Pt. 1. P. 19–30.
E. Rieken, I. Yakubovich. The New Values of Luwian Signs L 319 and L 172. I. Singer (ed.). Ipamati kistamati pari tumatimis: Luwian and Hittite Studies presented to J. David Hawkins on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Tel-Aviv: Institute of Archaeology, 2010. P. 199–219.
E. Rieken, I. Yakubovich. Hidden Pronominal Clitics in Luwian Texts. To appear in a forthcoming Festschrift.
D. Sasseville. Anatolian Verbal Stem Formation: Luwian, Lycian, and Lydian. (Brill's Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 21). Leiden: Brill, 2020.
Z. Simon. The Anatolian Stop System and the Indo-Hittite Hypothesis — Revisited. M. Serangeli, Th. Olander (eds.). Dispersals and Diversification: Linguistic and Archaeological Perspectives on the Early Changes in Indo-European. Leiden: Brill, 2020. P. 236–250.
Z. Simon. Cuneiform Luwian ꞊kuwa: Form and Meaning. Hungarian Assyriological Review. 2020. Vol. 1. P. 39–42.
F. Starke. Die keilschrift-luwischen Texte in Umschrift. (Studien zu den Boğazköy-Texten 30). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1985.
X. Vertegaal. Syllable Weight Gradation in the Luwic Languages. Transactions of Philological Society. 2020. Vol. 118. Pt. 2. P. 211–236.
I. Yakubovich. Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language. (Brill's Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 21). Leiden: Brill, 2010.
I. Yakubovich. The Luwian Deity Kwanza. Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies (Aramazd). 2013/2014. Vol. 8. Pt. 1–2. P. 282–297.
I. Yakubovich. The Luwian Language. Oxford Handbooks Online (21 Oct. 2015). Available at: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780199935345.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935345-e-18 (accessed on 7.11.2020).
Issue
18 (2022) 1
Документ